Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29544
Title: Staging Clavicular Development on MRI: Pitfalls and Suggestions for Age Estimation
Authors: De Tobel, Jannick
Hillewig, Elke
van Wijk, Mayonne
FIEUWS, Steffen 
de Haas, Michiel Bart
van Rijn, Rick R.
Thevissen, Patrick Werner
Verstraete, Koenraad Luc
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: WILEY
Source: JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 51 (2), p. 377-388
Abstract: Background MRI of the clavicle's sternal end has been studied for age estimation. Several pitfalls have been noted, but how they affect age estimation performance remains unclear. Purpose/Hypothesis To further study these pitfalls and to make suggestions for a proper use of clavicle MRI for forensic age estimation. Our hypotheses were that age estimation would benefit from 1) discarding stages 1 and 4/5; 2) including advanced substages 3aa, 3ab, and 3ac; 3) taking both clavicles into account; and 4) excluding morphological variants. Study Type Prospective cross-sectional. Population Healthy Caucasian volunteers between 11 and 30 years old (524; 277 females, 247 males). Field Strength/Sequence 3T, T-1-weighted gradient echo volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) MR-sequence. Assessment Four observers applied the most elaborate staging technique for long bone development that has been described in the current literature (including stages, substages, and advanced substages). One of the observers repeated a random selection of the assessments in 110 participants after a 2-week interval. Furthermore, all observers documented morphological variants. Statistical Tests Weighted kappa quantified reproducibility of staging. Bayes' rule was applied for age estimation with a continuation ratio model for the distribution of the stages. According to the hypotheses, different models were tested. Mean absolute error (MAE) differences between models were compared, as were MAEs between cases with and without morphological variants. Results Weighted kappa equaled 0.82 for intraobserver and ranged between 0.60 and 0.64 for interobserver agreement. Stages 1 and 4/5 were allocated interchangeably in 4.3% (54/1258). Age increased steadily in advanced substages of stage 3, but improvement in age estimation was not significant (right P = 0.596; left P = 0.313). The model that included both clavicles and discarded stages 1 and 4/5 yielded an MAE of 1.97 years, a root mean squared error of 2.60 years, and 69% correctly classified minors. Morphological variants rendered significantly higher MAEs (right 3.84 years, P = 0.015; left 2.93 years, P = 0.022). Data Conclusion Our results confirmed hypotheses 3) and 4), while hypotheses 1) and 2) remain to be investigated in larger studies. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.
Notes: [De Tobel, Jannick; Hillewig, Elke; Verstraete, Koenraad Luc] Univ Ghent, Dept Diagnost Sci Radiol, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. [De Tobel, Jannick; Thevissen, Patrick Werner] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Imaging & Pathol Forens Odontol, Leuven, Belgium. [De Tobel, Jannick] Leuven Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Leuven, Belgium. [van Wijk, Mayonne; de Haas, Michiel Bart] Netherlands Forens Inst, Div Special Serv & Expertise, Sect Forens Anthropol, The Hague, Netherlands. [Fieuws, Steffen] Leuven Univ, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. [Fieuws, Steffen] Hasselt Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, I BioStat, Leuven, Belgium. [van Rijn, Rick R.] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Keywords: age determination by skeleton;clavicle;adolescent;adult;magnetic resonance imaging
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29544
ISSN: 1053-1807
e-ISSN: 1522-2586
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26889
ISI #: 000479785200001
Rights: 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicin
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2020
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - 2019 - De Tobel - Staging Clavicular Development on MRI Pitfalls and Suggestions for Age.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version7.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 5, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

104
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

90
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.