Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29559
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | HANSEN, Dominique | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bonné, Kim | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alders, Toon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hermans, Ann | - |
dc.contributor.author | COPERMANS, Katrien | - |
dc.contributor.author | Swinnen, Hans | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maris, Vincent | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jansegers, Thomas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mathijs, Wout | - |
dc.contributor.author | Haenen, Laura | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vaes, Johan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Govaerts, Emmanuela | - |
dc.contributor.author | Reenaers, Veerle | - |
dc.contributor.author | FREDERIX, Ines | - |
dc.contributor.author | DENDALE, Paul | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-23T11:08:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-23T11:08:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European journal of preventive cardiology (Print), 26(18), p. 1921-1928. | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2047-4873 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29559 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aims: In the rehabilitation of cardiovascular disease patients a correct determination of the endurance-type exercise intensity is important to generate health benefits and preserve medical safety. It remains to be assessed whether the guideline-based exercise intensity domains are internally consistent and agree with physiological responses to exercise in cardiovascular disease patients. Methods: A total of 272 cardiovascular disease patients without pacemaker executed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test on bike (peak respiratory gas exchange ratio >1.09), to assess peak heart rate (HRpeak), oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and cycling power output (Wpeak). The first and second ventilatory threshold (VT1 and VT2, respectively) was determined and extrapolated to %VO2peak, %HRpeak, %heart rate reserve (%HRR) and %Wpeak for comparison with guideline-based exercise intensity domains. Results: VT1 was noted at 62 10% VO2peak, 75 10% HRpeak, 42 14% HRR and 47 11% Wpeak, corresponding to the high intensity exercise domain (for %VO2peak and %HRpeak) or low intensity exercise domain (for %Wpeak and %HRR). VT2 was noted at 84 9% VO2peak, 88 8% HRpeak, 74 15% HRR and 76 11% Wpeak, corresponding to the high intensity exercise domain (for %HRR and %Wpeak) or very hard exercise domain (for %HRpeak and %VO2peak). At best (when using %Wpeak) in only 63% and 72% of all patients VT1 and VT2, respectively, corresponded to the same guideline-based exercise intensity domain, but this dropped to about 48% and 52% at worst (when using %HRR and %HRpeak, respectively). In particular, the patient’s VO2peak related to differently elicited guideline-based exercise intensity domains (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The guideline-based exercise intensity domains for cardiovascular disease patients seem inconsistent, thus reiterating the need for adjustment. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: this study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Hartcentrum Hasselt, vzw. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD | - |
dc.rights | The European Society of Cardiology 2019 | - |
dc.subject.other | Cardiovascular rehabilitation | - |
dc.subject.other | exercise intensity | - |
dc.subject.other | guidelines | - |
dc.title | Exercise training intensity determination in cardiovascular rehabilitation: Should the guidelines be reconsidered? | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1928 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 18 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1921 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 26 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.publisher.place | 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
dc.source.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/2047487319859450 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31219704 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000503270700004 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2047-4881 | - |
local.provider.type | Web of Science | - |
local.uhasselt.uhpub | yes | - |
item.contributor | HANSEN, Dominique | - |
item.contributor | Bonné, Kim | - |
item.contributor | Alders, Toon | - |
item.contributor | Hermans, Ann | - |
item.contributor | COPERMANS, Katrien | - |
item.contributor | Swinnen, Hans | - |
item.contributor | Maris, Vincent | - |
item.contributor | Jansegers, Thomas | - |
item.contributor | Mathijs, Wout | - |
item.contributor | Haenen, Laura | - |
item.contributor | Vaes, Johan | - |
item.contributor | Govaerts, Emmanuela | - |
item.contributor | Reenaers, Veerle | - |
item.contributor | FREDERIX, Ines | - |
item.contributor | DENDALE, Paul | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2020 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
item.fullcitation | HANSEN, Dominique; Bonné, Kim; Alders, Toon; Hermans, Ann; COPERMANS, Katrien; Swinnen, Hans; Maris, Vincent; Jansegers, Thomas; Mathijs, Wout; Haenen, Laura; Vaes, Johan; Govaerts, Emmanuela; Reenaers, Veerle; FREDERIX, Ines & DENDALE, Paul (2019) Exercise training intensity determination in cardiovascular rehabilitation: Should the guidelines be reconsidered?. In: European journal of preventive cardiology (Print), 26(18), p. 1921-1928.. | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 2047-4873 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 2047-4881 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hansen2019.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 250.48 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Exercise intensity in cardiovascular rehabilitation R1.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 310.79 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.