Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29781
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVAN GEEL, Fanny-
dc.contributor.authorVELDKAMP, Renee-
dc.contributor.authorSEVERIJNS, Deborah-
dc.contributor.authorDalgas, Ulrik-
dc.contributor.authorFEYS, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T08:21:04Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T08:21:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 26 (13), pp. 1785-1789-
dc.identifier.issn1352-4585-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/29781-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Day-to-day reliability and cut-off values to detect abnormal walking fatigability (WF) remain to be investigated in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Methods: In all, 49 pwMS (mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ± standard deviation (SD): 3.3 ± 1.9) and 28 matched healthy controls (HC) performed the six-minute walking test (6MWT) on two different days to determine day-to-day reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) and limits of agreement (LOA) for five different equations of WF. Objective: To examine day-to-day reliability, agreement and discriminative validity for measuring WF. Results and conclusion: WF expressed as the ratio between the first and sixth minute had the best day-to-day reliability (ICC’s range of 0.76–0.95 and 0.60–0.86, respectively) in both pwMS and HC, while LOA were 15% and 7%, respectively. Ecological validity and clinical importance should be further investigated.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD-
dc.rightsThe Author(s), 2019. Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journalspermissions-
dc.subject.otherReliability-
dc.subject.otherfatigability-
dc.subject.otherwalking-
dc.subject.otherassessment-
dc.subject.othermultiple sclerosis-
dc.titleDay-to-day reliability, agreement and discriminative validity of measuring walking-related performance fatigability in persons with Multiple Sclerosis-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1789-
dc.identifier.issue13-
dc.identifier.spage1785-
dc.identifier.volume26-
local.format.pages5-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1352458519872465-
dc.identifier.pmid31496362-
dc.identifier.isi000486891300001-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/U96PJGFRCVQTDXS7BDWC/full-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-0970-
local.provider.typePubMed-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationVAN GEEL, Fanny; VELDKAMP, Renee; SEVERIJNS, Deborah; Dalgas, Ulrik & FEYS, Peter (2020) Day-to-day reliability, agreement and discriminative validity of measuring walking-related performance fatigability in persons with Multiple Sclerosis. In: Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 26 (13), pp. 1785-1789.-
item.contributorVAN GEEL, Fanny-
item.contributorVELDKAMP, Renee-
item.contributorSEVERIJNS, Deborah-
item.contributorDalgas, Ulrik-
item.contributorFEYS, Peter-
crisitem.journal.issn1352-4585-
crisitem.journal.eissn1477-0970-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
van-geel-et-al-2019-day-to-day-reliability-agreement-and-discriminative-validity-of-measuring-walking-related.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version355.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

168
checked on Aug 31, 2022

Download(s)

124
checked on Aug 31, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.