Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29781
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVAN GEEL, Fanny-
dc.contributor.authorVELDKAMP, Renee-
dc.contributor.authorSEVERIJNS, Deborah-
dc.contributor.authorDalgas, Ulrik-
dc.contributor.authorFEYS, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T08:21:04Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T08:21:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 26 (13), pp. 1785-1789-
dc.identifier.issn1352-4585-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/29781-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Day-to-day reliability and cut-off values to detect abnormal walking fatigability (WF) remain to be investigated in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Methods: In all, 49 pwMS (mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ± standard deviation (SD): 3.3 ± 1.9) and 28 matched healthy controls (HC) performed the six-minute walking test (6MWT) on two different days to determine day-to-day reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) and limits of agreement (LOA) for five different equations of WF. Objective: To examine day-to-day reliability, agreement and discriminative validity for measuring WF. Results and conclusion: WF expressed as the ratio between the first and sixth minute had the best day-to-day reliability (ICC’s range of 0.76–0.95 and 0.60–0.86, respectively) in both pwMS and HC, while LOA were 15% and 7%, respectively. Ecological validity and clinical importance should be further investigated.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD-
dc.rightsThe Author(s), 2019. Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journalspermissions-
dc.subject.otherReliability-
dc.subject.otherfatigability-
dc.subject.otherwalking-
dc.subject.otherassessment-
dc.subject.othermultiple sclerosis-
dc.titleDay-to-day reliability, agreement and discriminative validity of measuring walking-related performance fatigability in persons with Multiple Sclerosis-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1789-
dc.identifier.issue13-
dc.identifier.spage1785-
dc.identifier.volume26-
local.format.pages5-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1352458519872465-
dc.identifier.pmid31496362-
dc.identifier.isi000486891300001-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/U96PJGFRCVQTDXS7BDWC/full-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-0970-
local.provider.typePubMed-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorVAN GEEL, Fanny-
item.contributorVELDKAMP, Renee-
item.contributorSEVERIJNS, Deborah-
item.contributorDalgas, Ulrik-
item.contributorFEYS, Peter-
item.fullcitationVAN GEEL, Fanny; VELDKAMP, Renee; SEVERIJNS, Deborah; Dalgas, Ulrik & FEYS, Peter (2020) Day-to-day reliability, agreement and discriminative validity of measuring walking-related performance fatigability in persons with Multiple Sclerosis. In: Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 26 (13), pp. 1785-1789.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.validationecoom 2020-
crisitem.journal.issn1352-4585-
crisitem.journal.eissn1477-0970-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
van-geel-et-al-2019-day-to-day-reliability-agreement-and-discriminative-validity-of-measuring-walking-related.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version355.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.