Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29788
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPena, Julio-
dc.contributor.authorNAPOLES RUIZ, Gonzalo-
dc.contributor.authorSalgueiro, Yamisleydi-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T11:53:38Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T11:53:38Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2020-07-16T10:04:33Z-
dc.identifier.citationARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 53 (5) p. 3127-3152-
dc.identifier.issn0269-2821-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/29788-
dc.description.abstractAttribute weighting is a key aspect when modeling multi-attribute decision analysis problems. Despite the large number of proposals reported in the literature, reaching a consensus on the most convenient method for a certain scenario is difficult, if not impossible. As a first contribution of this paper, we propose a categorization of existing methodologies, which goes beyond the current taxonomy (subjective, objective, hybrid). As a second contribution, supported by the new categorization, we survey and critically discuss the explicit weighting methods (which are closely related to the subjective ones). The critical discussion allows evaluating how much a solution can deviate from the expected one if no foresight is taken. As a final contribution, we summarize the main drawbacks from a global perspective and propose some insights to correct them. Such a discussion attempts to improve the reliability of decision support systems involving human experts.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.rightsSpringer Nature B.V. 2019-
dc.subject.otherAttribute weighting-
dc.subject.otherDecision making-
dc.subject.otherMultiple attribute decision making-
dc.subject.otherExplicit weighting methods-
dc.titleExplicit methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage3152-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage3127-
dc.identifier.volume53-
local.format.pages26-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesPena, J (corresponding author), Cent Univ Las Villas, Ctr Studies Computat Mech & Numer Methods Engn, Santa Clara, Cuba.-
dc.description.notesjpena@uclv.cu; gonzalo.napoles@uhasselt.be; ysalgueiro@utalca.cl-
dc.description.otherPena, J (corresponding author), Cent Univ Las Villas, Ctr Studies Computat Mech & Numer Methods Engn, Santa Clara, Cuba. jpena@uclv.cu; gonzalo.napoles@uhasselt.be; ysalgueiro@utalca.cl-
local.publisher.placeVAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.source.typeReview-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10462-019-09757-w-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000534130800001-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7462-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.description.affiliation[Salgueiro, Yamisleydi] Univ Talca, Dept Comp Sci, Talca, Chile.-
local.description.affiliation[Pena, Julio] Cent Univ Las Villas, Ctr Studies Computat Mech & Numer Methods Engn, Santa Clara, Cuba.-
local.description.affiliation[Napoles, Gonzalo] Univ Hasselt, Fac Business Econ, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.contributorPena, Julio-
item.contributorNAPOLES RUIZ, Gonzalo-
item.contributorSalgueiro, Yamisleydi-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationPena, Julio; NAPOLES RUIZ, Gonzalo & Salgueiro, Yamisleydi (2020) Explicit methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study. In: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 53 (5) p. 3127-3152.-
item.validationecoom 2021-
crisitem.journal.issn0269-2821-
crisitem.journal.eissn1573-7462-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
manuscript.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version574.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Pena2019_Article_ExplicitMethodsForAttributeWei.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version499.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on May 17, 2024

Page view(s)

124
checked on Jul 14, 2022

Download(s)

80
checked on Jul 14, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.