Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSMET, Stijn-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-23T11:36:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-23T11:36:57Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Legal Materials, 50(3), p. 628-645-
dc.identifier.issn0020-7829-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/29833-
dc.description.abstractIn E.S. v. Austria, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a criminal conviction for making disparaging comments about the Prophet Muhammad, intimating in particular that he was a pedophile, did not violate the speaker's right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights2019 by The American Society of International Law-
dc.titleE.S. v. Austria-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage645-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage628-
dc.identifier.volume50-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesPublication consists of a case note (two pages) and the text of a judgment (remainder of pages).-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedNote-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/ilm.2019.23-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorSMET, Stijn-
item.fullcitationSMET, Stijn (2019) E.S. v. Austria. In: International Legal Materials, 50(3), p. 628-645.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.validationvabb 2021-
crisitem.journal.issn0020-7829-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Smet, Note E.S. v. Austria.pdf
  Restricted Access		Non Peer-reviewed author version420.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
smet2019.pdf
  Restricted Access		Published version190.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.