Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHUSSAIN, Qinaat-
dc.contributor.authorAlhajyaseen, Wael K.M.-
dc.contributor.authorBRIJS, Kris-
dc.contributor.authorPIRDAVANI, Ali-
dc.contributor.authorBRIJS, Tom-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-12T09:26:35Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-12T09:26:35Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationAccident analysis and prevention, 134 (Art N° 105349)-
dc.identifier.issn0001-4575-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/29920-
dc.description.abstractThe change interval, which includes the yellow and all-red times, plays a crucial role in the safety and operation of signalized intersections. During this interval, drivers not only need to decide to stop or go but also have to interact with drivers both in front and behind, trying to avoid conflicting decisions. Red light running and inconsistent stopping behavior may increase the risk for angular and rear-end crashes. This study aims to investigate the effect of different innovative countermeasures on red light running prevention and safe stopping behavior at signalized intersections. Five different conditions were tested inviting sixty-seven volunteers with a valid driving license. The conditions include a default traffic signal setting (control condition), flashing green signal setting (F-green), red LED ground lights integrated with a traffic signal (R-LED), yellow interval countdown variable message sign (C-VMS), and red light running detection camera warning gantry (RW-gantry). Drivers in each condition were exposed to two different situations based on the distance from the stop line. In the first situation, drivers were located in the indecision zone while in the second situation they were located in the likely stopping zone. A series of logistic regression analyses and linear mixed models were conducted to investigate the overall safety effects of the different countermeasures. The probability of red light running (RLR) was significantly reduced for R-LED in both analyses (i.e. in the total sample, and in the sample of crossed vehicles). Moreover, a clearly inconsistent stopping behavior was observed for the flashing green condition. Furthermore, a unit increase in speed (kph) at the onset of yellow interval significantly increases the probability of RLR by 5.3 %. The study showed that R-LED was the most effective solution for improving red light running prevention and encouraging a consistent stopping behavior at the intersection. In conclusion, the R-LED and the RW-gantry treatments are recommended as effective tools to improve safety at signalized intersections.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis publication was made possible by the NPRP award [NPRP 9- 360-2-150] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author[s].-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.rights2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved-
dc.subject.otherRed light running-
dc.subject.otherSignalized intersection-
dc.subject.otherDynamic ground lights-
dc.subject.otherCountdown signal-
dc.subject.otherDilemma zone-
dc.subject.othervariable message sign-
dc.titleInnovative countermeasures for red light running prevention at signalized intersections: A driving simulator study-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.volume134-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.placeTHE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr105349-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aap.2019.105349-
dc.identifier.pmid31707167-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000501651900016-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2057-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationHUSSAIN, Qinaat; Alhajyaseen, Wael K.M.; BRIJS, Kris; PIRDAVANI, Ali & BRIJS, Tom (2020) Innovative countermeasures for red light running prevention at signalized intersections: A driving simulator study. In: Accident analysis and prevention, 134 (Art N° 105349).-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2021-
item.contributorHUSSAIN, Qinaat-
item.contributorAlhajyaseen, Wael K.M.-
item.contributorBRIJS, Kris-
item.contributorPIRDAVANI, Ali-
item.contributorBRIJS, Tom-
crisitem.journal.issn0001-4575-
crisitem.journal.eissn1879-2057-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0001457519308449-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Author version.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

218
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Download(s)

142
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.