Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30034
Title: Midwives', Obstetricians', and Recently Delivered Mothers' Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey
Authors: LANSSENS, Dorien 
VANDENBERK, Thijs 
LODEWIJCKX, Joy 
Peeters, Tessa
STORMS, Valerie 
THIJS, Inge 
GRIETEN, Lars 
GYSELAERS, Wilfried 
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
Source: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 21(4) (Art N° e10887)
Abstract: Background: The Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study enrolled pregnant women at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and investigated the effect of remote monitoring in addition to their prenatal follow-up. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions and experiences of remote monitoring among mothers, midwives, and obstetricians who participated in the PREMOM study. Methods: We developed specific questionnaires for the mothers, midwives, and obstetricians addressing 5 domains: (1) prior knowledge and experience of remote monitoring, (2) reactions to abnormal values, (3) privacy, (4) quality and patient safety, and (5) financial aspects. We also questioned the health care providers about which issues they considered important when implementing remote monitoring. We used a 5-point Likert scale to provide objective scores. It was possible to add free-text feedback at every question. Results: A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaires. The mothers, midwives, and obstetricians reported positive experiences and perceptions of remote monitoring, although most of them had no or little prior experience with this technology. They supported a further rollout of remote monitoring in Belgium. Nearly three-quarters of the mothers (34/47, 72%) did not report any problems with taking the measurements at the required times. Almost half of the mothers (19/47, 40%) wanted to be contacted within 3 to 12 hours after abnormal measurement values, preferably by telephone. Conclusions: Although most of midwives and obstetricians had no or very little experience with remote monitoring before enrolling in the PREMOM study, they reported, based on their one-year experience, that remote monitoring was an important component in the follow-up of high-risk pregnancies and would recommend it to their colleagues and pregnant patients.
Notes: [Lanssens, Dorien; Vandenberk, Thijs; Lodewijckx, Joy; Peeters, Tessa; Storms, Valerie; Thijs, Inge M.; Grieten, Lars; Gyselaers, Wilfried] Hasselt Univ, Mobile Hlth Unit, Limburg Clin Res Program, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Lanssens, Dorien; Vandenberk, Thijs; Lodewijckx, Joy; Peeters, Tessa; Storms, Valerie; Thijs, Inge M.; Grieten, Lars; Gyselaers, Wilfried] Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Lanssens, Dorien; Thijs, Inge M.; Gyselaers, Wilfried] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Cardiol & Future Hlth, Genk, Belgium.
Keywords: remote monitoring; gestational hypertensive diseases; questionnaires; monitoring, ambulatory; hypertension, pregnancy-induced; surveys and questionnaires;remote monitoring; gestational hypertensive diseases; questionnaires; monitoring; ambulatory; hypertension; pregnancy-induced; surveys and questionnaires
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30034
ISSN: 1438-8871
DOI: 10.2196/10887
ISI #: 000465547600001
Rights: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2020
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
lanssens 1.pdfPublished version635.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
checked on Apr 8, 2024

Page view(s)

102
checked on Aug 10, 2022

Download(s)

146
checked on Aug 10, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.