Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31044
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorKNAPEN, Luk-
dc.contributor.authorDugundji, Elenna-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-20T13:24:32Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-20T13:24:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2020-04-16T12:21:27Z-
dc.identifier.citationShakshuki, E; Yasar, A (Ed.). The 11th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT) / The 3rd International Conference on Emerging Data and Industry 4.0 (EDI40) / Affiliated Workshops ,Elsevier Science BV, p. 107 -114-
dc.identifier.issn1877-0509-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/31044-
dc.description.abstractPublic transit is a backbone for well-functioning cities, forming a complicated system of interconnecting lines each with their own frequency. Defining accessibility for public transit is just as complicated, as travel times can change every minute depending on location and departure time. With Pareto optimal journeys it is possible to look beyond the earliest arrival times and also optimize for the shortest travel time, as travellers base their departure time on the start time given by their smartphone app, especially when service frequencies are low. By querying for all Pareto optimal journeys in a time range it becomes possible to get a grasp of what passengers see as their choice set when it comes to transit route choice. Based on the averages of the Pareto optimal journeys it should become possible to calculate more realistic skim matrices for traffic analysis zones, including reliability factors such as frequencies and the number of transfers. In this study we calculate Pareto optimal journeys in the area in and around Amsterdam, looking at how travel times are distributed and what factors impact them. Public transportation is an important travel mode that keeps cities liveable. Determining travel times for public transport alternatives is a more difficult task than for pedestrians, bicyclists and even cars. This has multiple reasons, starting with the fact that public transportation always involves another modality such as walking or cycling, meaning that public transportation accessibility is heavily dependant on the distance from the origin to the nearest location to board a transit vehicle and the distance between the destination and the nearest location to disembark transit. A main reason that analysis of public transportation is difficult is that we are dealing with a time-dependent network, as transit is an intricate system of buses, trains, trams, metros that drive in frequencies that change depending on the time-of-day and are affected by external factors such as traffic and weather. To compensate for these external factors, timetables often include extra time in the travel time and transfer times, so passengers will still be able to make transfers in case of minor delays and the vehicle will just wait in locations where possible and convenient. Finally there are situations where there is trade-off between the access and egress distance and the total travel time. For example, a bus stop next Abstract Public transit is a backbone for well-functioning cities, forming a complicated system of interconnecting lines each with their own frequency. Defining accessibility for public transit is just as complicated, as travel times can change every minute depending on location and departure time. With Pareto optimal journeys it is possible to look beyond the earliest arrival times and also optimize for the shortest travel time, as travellers base their departure time on the start time given by their smartphone app, especially when service frequencies are low. By querying for all Pareto optimal journeys in a time range it becomes possible to get a grasp of what passengers see as their choice set when it comes to transit route choice. Based on the averages of the Pareto optimal journeys it should become possible to calculate more realistic skim matrices for traffic analysis zones, including reliability factors such as frequencies and the number of transfers. In this study we calculate Pareto optimal journeys in the area in and around Amsterdam, looking at how travel times are distributed and what factors impact them. Public transportation is an important travel mode that keeps cities liveable. Determining travel times for public transport alternatives is a more difficult task than for pedestrians, bicyclists and even cars. This has multiple reasons, starting with the fact that public transportation always involves another modality such as walking or cycling, meaning that public transportation accessibility is heavily dependant on the distance from the origin to the nearest location to board a transit vehicle and the distance between the destination and the nearest location to disembark transit. A main reason that analysis of public transportation is difficult is that we are dealing with a time-dependent network, as transit is an intricate system of buses, trains, trams, metros that drive in frequencies that change depending on the time-of-day and are affected by external factors such as traffic and weather. To compensate for these external factors, timetables often include extra time in the travel time and transfer times, so passengers will still be able to make transfers in case of minor delays and the vehicle will just wait in locations where possible and convenient. Finally there are situations where there is trade-off between the access and egress distance and the total travel time. For example, a bus stop next-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier Science BV-
dc.rights2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license-
dc.subject.otherpublic transit-
dc.subject.otheraccessibility-
dc.subject.otherpareto optimal transit-
dc.subject.otheractivity based travel demand model-
dc.subject.otherskim matrices Keywords: public transit-
dc.subject.otherskim matrices-
dc.titleDoor-to-door transit accessibility using Pareto optimal range queries-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsShakshuki, Elhadi-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsYasar, Ansar-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate2020 April, 06-09-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameThe 11th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT)-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceWarsaw, Poland-
dc.identifier.epage114-
dc.identifier.spage107-
dc.identifier.volume170-
local.format.pages8-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
dc.description.other- Physical conference meeting canceled due to COVID-19 - ant_2020_paper20_review.pdf contains the reviewers comments-
local.publisher.placeSARA BURGERHARTSTRAAT 25, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS-
dc.relation.references[1] Benenson, I., Martens, K., Rof´e, Y., Kwartler, A., 2011. Public transport versus private car gis-based estimation of accessibility applied to the tel aviv metropolitan area. The Annals of Regional Science 47, 499–515. [2] Blanchard, S.D., Waddell, P., 2017. Urbanaccess: generalized methodology for measuring regional accessibility with an integrated pedestrian and transit network. Transportation research record 2653, 35–44. [3] Bovy, P.H., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., 2005. Modelling route choice behaviour in multi-modal transport networks. Transportation 32, 341–368. [4] Cats, O., Gkioulou, Z., 2017. Modeling the impacts of public transport reliability and travel information on passengers’ waiting-time uncer- tainty. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics 6, 247–270. [5] CBS, . Wijk- en buurtkaart 2019. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/dossier/nederland-regionaal/geografische-data/ wijk-en-buurtkaart-2019. Accessed: 2019-11-29. [6] Curtis, C., Scheurer, J., 2010. Planning for sustainable accessibility: Developing tools to aid discussion and decision-making. Progress in Planning 74, 53–106. [7] Delling, D., Pajor, T., Werneck, R.F., 2014. Round-based public transit routing. Transportation Science 49, 591–604. [8] Delmelle, E.C., Casas, I., 2012. Evaluating the spatial equity of bus rapid transit-based accessibility patterns in a developing country: The case of cali, colombia. Transport Policy 20, 36–46. [9] Dibbelt, J., Pajor, T., Strasser, B., Wagner, D., 2018. Connection scan algorithm. Journal of Experimental Algorithmics (JEA) 23, 1–7. [10] Guis, N., Nij¨enstein, S., 2015. Modelleren van klantvoorkeuren in dienstregelingsstudies, in: Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk. Antwerpen: NS. [11] Hadas, Y., Ranjitkar, P., 2012. Modeling public-transit connectivity with spatial quality-of-transfer measurements. journal of Transport Geography 22, 137–147. [12] Horni, A., Nagel, K., Axhausen, K.W., 2016. The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim. Ubiquity Press London. [13] Kujala, R., Weckstr¨om, C., Mladenovi´c, M.N., Saram¨aki, J., 2018. Travel times and transfers in public transport: Comprehensive accessibility analysis based on pareto-optimal journeys. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 67, 41–54. [14] O’Sullivan, D., Morrison, A., Shearer, J., 2000. Using desktop gis for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14, 85–104. [15] OVapi, . Gtfs netherlands. http://gtfs.ovapi.nl/nl/. Accessed: 2019-11-29. [16] Raveau, S., Guo, Z., Mu˜noz, J.C., Wilson, N.H., 2014. A behavioural comparison of route choice on metro networks: Time, transfers, crowding, topology and socio-demographics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 66, 185–195. [17] Salonen, M., Toivonen, T., 2013. Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport. Journal of transport Geography 31, 143–153. [18] SchweizerischeBundesbahnen, . GitHub matsim-extensions by sbb. https://github.com/SchweizerischeBundesbahnen/ matsim-sbb-extensions#skim-matrices. Accessed: 2019-12-01. [19] Tenkanen, H., Heikinheimo, V., J¨arv, O., Salonen, M., Toivonen, T., 2016. Open data for accessibility and travel time analyses: Helsinki region travel time and co2 matrix, in: Geospatial data in a changing world: The short papers and poster papers of the 19th agile conference on geographic information science, 14–17 June 2016, Helsinki, Finland. [20] Tribby, C.P., Zandbergen, P.A., 2012. High-resolution spatio-temporal modeling of public transit accessibility. Applied Geography 34, 345– 355.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.014-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000582714500013-
dc.identifier.eissn-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleThe 11th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT) / The 3rd International Conference on Emerging Data and Industry 4.0 (EDI40) / Affiliated Workshops-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorKoch, Thomas-
item.contributorKNAPEN, Luk-
item.contributorDugundji, Elenna-
item.validationecoom 2021-
item.fullcitationKoch, Thomas; KNAPEN, Luk & Dugundji, Elenna (2020) Door-to-door transit accessibility using Pareto optimal range queries. In: Shakshuki, E; Yasar, A (Ed.). The 11th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT) / The 3rd International Conference on Emerging Data and Industry 4.0 (EDI40) / Affiliated Workshops ,Elsevier Science BV, p. 107 -114.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1877-0509-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1877050920304439-main.pdfPublished version1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.