Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31071Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tassinari, Virginia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | ROOSEN, Barbara | - |
| dc.contributor.author | CONSTANTINESCU, Teodora | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-22T08:33:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-04-22T08:33:03Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-04-17T15:18:17Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers, Association for Computing Machinery, p. 1 -11 (Art N° 1) | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-4503-6371-6 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31071 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This article discusses the difficult task of Participatory Design (PD) to design for/with the political dimension of work, such as the work environments' care for inclusion of different groups. It first describes PD's role through time in giving form to this political dimension after the crisis of Fordism and detects some challenges PD is confronted with in addressing this task today. It then explores how Hannah Arendt's reflections on the political dimension of work can contribute to addressing these challenges, researching how her definitions of 'work', 'labour', 'action', 'agorà', 'heroes' and 'interests' can be used as steering concepts that support the (re)activation of this political dimension. We describe how we used Arendt's concepts to steer a PD case in urban design with a group of architects, companies and citizens on how to reintegrate work into the city space of Antwerp. This paper ends with a discussion on the implications of using Arendt's concepts in PD for work. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | Association for Computing Machinery | - |
| dc.subject.other | participation | - |
| dc.subject.other | politics | - |
| dc.subject.other | work | - |
| dc.subject.other | participatory design | - |
| dc.title | Work, labour and action: the role of participatory design in (re)activating the political dimension of work | - |
| dc.type | Proceedings Paper | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate | 20-24 August 2018 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | Participatory Design Conference 2018 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Hasselt | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 11 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | C1 | - |
| dc.description.other | PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 | - |
| local.publisher.place | New York | - |
| dc.relation.references | [1] Liesbeth Huybrechts, Henric Benesch & Jon Geib. 2017. Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the public realm. In CoDesign, 13, 3, 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006 [2] Jane Jacobs. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York. [3] Hannah Arendt. 2013. The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [4] Antonio Gramsci. 1934. Americanism and Fordism. Gramsci Quaderni dal Carcere, 1, Einaudi, 1975. [5] Ash Amin. 1995. Postfordism: A Reader, edited by Ash Amin, 409–427. Wiley, New York. [6] Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. Verso, London and New York. [7] Jacques Rancière. 2004. Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Polity Press, Cambridge. [8] Mahmoud Keshavarz and Ramia Maze. 2013. Design and Dissensus: Framing and Staging Participation in Design Research. Design Philosophy Papers, 11, 1, 7-29, doi/abs/10.2752/089279313X13968799815994. [9] Thomas Binder, Eva Brandt, Pelle Ehn, and Joachim Halse. 2015. “Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 152–65. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248 [10] Richard Sennett. 2009. The Craftsman. Penguin, London. [11] Peter Mair. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. Verso, London and New York. [12] Ahrensbach, T. and Beunderman, J., Eds. 2012.Compendium for the Civic Economy. Trancity Valiz, Amsterdam. [13] Borgonuovo, V. and Frnsceschini, S., Eds. 2015. Global Tools 1973-1975. SALT/Garanti Kültür: Istanbul. AŞ. Retrieved from http://saltonline.org/media/files/globaltools_scrd-1.pdf. [14] Susanne Bødker, Pelle Ehn, Morten Kyng, John Kammersgaard, J., and Yngve Sundblad, 1987. A UTOPIAN Experience: On design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphic workers. In Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Gower. [15] Papanek, Victor. 1985. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Pantheon Books, New York. [16] National Research Council. 1999. The Changing Nature of Work: Implications for Occupational Analysis. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/9600. [17] Clay Spinuzzi. 2012. Working Alone Together. Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 4, 399-441; doi:10.1177/1050651912444070 [18] Andy C. Pratt. 2002. Hot jobs in cool places. The material cultures of new media product spaces: The case of South of the Market, San Francisco. Information, Communication and Society, 5, 1, 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180110117640 [19] Rachel Botsman and Roo Rogers, Eds.. 2011. What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. Collins, New York. [20] Eleanor Colleoni and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. Knowledge sharing and social capital building. The role of co-working spaces in the knowledge economy in Milan. Unpublished Report. Office for Youth, Municipality of Milan. [21] Carl DiSalvo, Andrew Clement, and Volkmar Pipek. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In J. Simonsen & Toni Robertson (eds.). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge International Handbooks, New York, 2012, 182-209 . [22] Steven Graham and Simon Marvin. 1994. More than Ducts and Wires: Post-Fordism, Cities and Utility Networks. In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, edited by Patsy Healey, Stuart Cameron, Simin Davoudi, Stephen Graham and Ali Madani-Pour, 169–190. Wiley, London. [23] Jane Fulton Suri. 2003. The experience of evolution: developments in design practice. The Design Journal, 6, 2, 39-48; http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/146069203789355471 [24] Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the tenth anniversary conference on participatory design 2008. Indiana University. 92-101. DOI: 10.1145/1795234.1795248 [25] Ezio Manzini, Francesca Rizzo. 2011. Small projects/large changes: Participatory design as an open participated process. CoDesign, 7, 3-4, 199-215, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630472 [26] Maurizo Teli, Silvia Bordin, María Menéndez Blanco, Giusi Orabona, and Antonella De Angeli. 2015. Public Design of Digital Commons in Urban Places: A Case Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 81, 17–30, doi>10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.02.003. [27] Pelle Ehn, Elisabet M. Nilsson, and Richard Topgaard (eds.). 2014. Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy. MIT Press, Massachusetts. [28] General Intellect. Commonfare or the Welfare of the CommonWealth. Inte Gloerich, Geert Lovink, Patricia De Vries. Moneylab. Overcoming the hype. [29] Anna Seravalli, Mette Agger Eriksen & Per-Anders Hillgren. 2017. Co-Design in co-production processes: jointly articulating and appropriating infrastructuring and commoning with civil servants. CoDesign, 13, 3, 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355004 [30] Virginia Tassinari, Francesca Piredda & Elisa Bertolotti. 2017. Storytelling in design for social innovation and politics: a reading through the lenses of Hannah Arendt. The Design Journal, 20, supl 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352852 [31] Elisa Bertolotti and Virginia Tassinari. 2017. Experimenting “theatres” for social innovation. A reading through the lenses of Hannah Arendt. NORDES Proceedings. [32] Hannah Arendt. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianisms. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. [33] Jacques Rancière. 2006. The Politics of Aesthetics. A&C Black, London. [34] Ezio Manzini. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs. An Introduction to Design for Innovation. MIT Press, Massachusetts. [35] Per-Anders Hillgren, Anna Seravalli, Mette Agger Eriksen. 2016. Counter-hegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9, 2, 89-93. doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.04 [36] Bernardo Secchi and Paola Vigano’. 2009. Antwerp: Territory Of A New Modernity. Sun Publishers, Amsterdam. [37] Wendy Gunn, Ton Otto, Rachel Charlotte Smith, Eds. 2013. Design Anthropology. Theory and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic, London. [38] Jamer Hunt. 2011. Prototyping the Social: Temporality and Speculative Futures at the Intersection of Design and Culture. 33-44. In: Alison Clark. Design Anthropology. Springer, Vienna. [39] Marijn van de Weijer, Koenraad Van Cleempoel, and Hilde Heynen. 2014. Positioning Research and Design in Academia and Practice. A Contribution to a Continuing Debate. Design Issues, 30, 2, 17-29, doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00259. [40] Henry Sanoff. 1991. Visual research methods in design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. [41] Hannah Arendt. 2017. The Origins of Totalitarianisms. Penguin UK. | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Proceedings Paper | - |
| local.relation.ispartofseriesnr | 1 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.artnr | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/3210586.3210599 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | 000546053000001 | - |
| local.provider.type | - | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.btitle | PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers | - |
| local.uhasselt.uhpub | yes | - |
| item.contributor | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth | - |
| item.contributor | Tassinari, Virginia | - |
| item.contributor | ROOSEN, Barbara | - |
| item.contributor | CONSTANTINESCU, Teodora | - |
| item.fullcitation | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth; Tassinari, Virginia; ROOSEN, Barbara & CONSTANTINESCU, Teodora (2018) Work, labour and action: the role of participatory design in (re)activating the political dimension of work. In: PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers, Association for Computing Machinery, p. 1 -11 (Art N° 1). | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.validation | ecoom 2022 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3210586.3210599 (1).pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 482.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
| Work, Labour and Action PDC2018, author version.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 414.07 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.