Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31094
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.authorTeli, Maurizio-
dc.contributor.authorZULJEVIC, Mela-
dc.contributor.authorBettega, Mela-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-23T07:44:32Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-23T07:44:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2020-04-22T14:29:25Z-
dc.identifier.citationCoDesign (Print), 16 (1) , p. 3 -16 (Art N° 1)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/31094-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we draw upon the articles included in this special issue to question how to re-politicise co-design and participatory design (PD). Many authors in these fields have recently made a plea to re-engage with ‘big issues’ as a way to address this concern. At the same time, there is an increased attention into the micro-politics of the relations that are built-in co-design and PD. These two approaches are sometimes presented as working against each other with a de-politicising dynamic as a result. The editorial hypothesis of this issue is that designing visions can turn the tension between addressing the big issues and close attention to the particularity of relations into a motor for re-politicising design. Through engaging with literature, the articles presented in this issue, and two fieldwork cases that explore this dynamic, we discovered that paying careful attention to the activity of designing visions can support re-politicisation. While visions enable us to develop relations with close attention to their politics, building relations supports a more political approach to designing visions on issues. We argue that vision-making can particularly support re-politicisation when it enables the articulation of the political by relating its situated reality to how it unfolds in space and time.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD-
dc.subject.otherparticipatory design-
dc.subject.otherpolitics-
dc.subject.othervisions-
dc.subject.othermapping-
dc.titleVisions that change. Articulating the politics of participatory design-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage16-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage3-
dc.identifier.volume16-
local.format.pages95-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND-
dc.relation.referencesAkama, Yoko. 2015. ‘Being Awake to Ma: Designing in between-Ness as a Way of Becoming With’. CoDesign 11 (3–4): 262–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081243. Avram, Gabriela, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Stefano De Paoli, Ann Light, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2019. ‘Repositioning CoDesign in the Age of Platform Capitalism: From Sharing to Caring’. CoDesign 15 (3): 185–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1638063. Binder, Thomas, Eva Brandt, Pelle Ehn, and Joachim Halse. 2015. ‘Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory’. CoDesign 11 (3–4): 152–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248. Blauvelt, Andrew. 2008. ‘Towards Relational Design’. Design Observer, 21. Bødker, Susanne, and Morten Kyng. 2018. ‘Participatory Design That Matters—Facing the Big Issues’. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25 (1): 4:1–4:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421. Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Les Presses du réel. Corner, James. 2011. ‘The Agency of Mapping: Speculation, Critique and Invention’. In The Map Reader, edited by M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, and C. Perkins, 89–101. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.ch12. Correia, António, Hugo Paredes, and Benjamim Fonseca. 2018. ‘Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in CSCW’. Scientometrics 114 (1): 31–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2562-0. Dillahunt, Tawanna R., Xinyi Wang, Earnest Wheeler, Hao Fei Cheng, Brent Hecht, and Haiyi Zhu. 2017. ‘The Sharing Economy in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review’. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1 (CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1145/3134673. Dindler, Christian, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2014. ‘Relational Expertise in Participatory Design’. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1, 41–50. PDC ’14. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661452. Frauenberger, Christopher. 2019. ‘Entanglement HCI The Next Wave?’ ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27 (1): 2. Frauenberger, Christopher, Marcus Foth, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2018. ‘On Scale, Dialectics, and Affect: Pathways for Proliferating Participatory Design’. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 12:1–12:13. PDC ’18. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210591. Fry, Tony. 2014. City Futures in the Age of a Changing Climate. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315765969. Hecht, Brent, and Loren Terveen. 2017. ‘The Role of Human Geography in Collective Intelligence’. In Collective Intelligence. Huybrechts, Liesbeth, Henric Benesch, and Jon Geib. 2017a. ‘Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm’. CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. Huybrechts, 2017b. ‘Co-Design and the Public Realm’. CoDesign 13 (3): 145–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355042. Huybrechts, Liesbeth, Niels Hendriks, and Sarah Martens. 2017. ‘Counterfactual Scripting: Challenging the Temporality of Participation’. CoDesign 13 (2): 96–109. Johnson, Isaac L., Yilun Lin, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Andrew Hall, Aaron Halfaker, Johannes Schöning, and Brent Hecht. 2016. ‘Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide’. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 13–25. CHI ’16. San Jose, California, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858123. Light, Ann, and Clodagh Miskelly. 2019. ‘Platforms, Scales and Networks: Meshing a Local Sustainable Sharing Economy’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28 (3): 591–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09352-1. Lyle, Peter, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. ‘Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration’. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 452:1–452:12. CHI ’18. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174026. Mannocci, Andrea, Francesco Osborne, and Enrico Motta. 2019. ‘The Evolution of IJHCS and CHI: A Quantitative Analysis’. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 131 (November): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.009. Mazé, Ramia. 2019. ‘Politics of Designing Visions of the Future’. Journal of Futures Studies 23 (3): 23–38. Otto, Ton. 2016. ‘History In and For Design’. Journal of Design History 29 (1): 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epv044. Sciannamblo, Mariacristina, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2018. ‘Fostering Commonfare. Entanglements between Participatory Design and Feminism’. In Proceedings of DRS 2018 International Conference: Catalyst, 2:458–71. DRS 2018. Limerick, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.21606/dma.2018.557. Su, Norman Makoto, Jean Hardy, Morgan Vigil-Hayes, Tiffany Veinot, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2019. ‘Call for Papers: Special Issue on Rural Computing and HCI’. Rural Computing and HCI (blog). 4 October 2019. https://ruralhci.info/2019/10/04/call-for-papers/. Swyngedouw, Erik. 2007. ‘The Post-Political City’. In Urban Politics Now: Re-Imagining Democracy in the Neo-Liberal City, edited by BAVO, 58–76. Teli, Maurizio. 2015. ‘Computing and the Common: Hints of a New Utopia in Participatory Design’. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives, 17–20. CA ’15. Aarhus University Press. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21318. Teli, Maurizio, Angela Di Fiore, and Vincenzo D’Andrea. 2017. ‘Computing and the Common: A Case of Participatory Design with Think Tanks’. CoDesign 13 (2): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1309439. Teli, Maurizio, Peter Lyle, and Mariacristina Sciannamblo. 2018. ‘Institutioning the Common: The Case of Commonfare’. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 6:1–6:11. PDC ’18. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210590. Teli, Maurizio, and Maria Menendez-Blanco. 2018. ‘Design Initiatives in Public Spaces : Eight Interpretative Lenses’. In Participatory Design Theory, edited by Oswald Devisch, Liesbeth Huybrechts, and Roel De Ridder, 71–86. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110332-6. Thebault-Spieker, Jacob, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2015. ‘Avoiding the South Side and the Suburbs: The Geography of Mobile Crowdsourcing Markets’. In CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 265–75. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675278. Tuck, Eve, Marcia McKenzie, and Marcia McKenzie. 2014. Place in Research : Theory, Methodology, and Methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764849.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr1-
local.type.programmeH2020-
dc.source.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15710882.2020.1728907-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000515551500002-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
item.contributorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
item.contributorTeli, Maurizio-
item.contributorZULJEVIC, Mela-
item.contributorBettega, Mela-
item.fullcitationHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth; Teli, Maurizio; ZULJEVIC, Mela & Bettega, Mela (2020) Visions that change. Articulating the politics of participatory design. In: CoDesign (Print), 16 (1) , p. 3 -16 (Art N° 1).-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1571-0882-
crisitem.journal.eissn1745-3755-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Visions that change Articulating the politics of participatory design.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Visions that change special issue in template author copy.pdfPeer-reviewed author version620.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

60
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

74
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.