Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31185
Title: Potential advantages in heat and power production when biogas is collected from several digesters using dedicated pipelines - A case study in the “Province of West-Flanders” (Belgium)
Authors: Hengeveld, E. J.
Bekkering, J.
VAN DAEL, Miet 
van Gemert, W. J. T.
Broekhuis, A. A.
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Source: Renewable Energy, 149 , p. 549 -564
Abstract: In the case study "West-Flanders" costs of electricity and heat production are estimated if a dedicated biogas grid using pipelines would be implemented to centralize energy production in a region. Heat may not be used effectively at digester sites, e.g. because of a change in treatment of digestate. A large scale centralized combined heat and power (CHP) engine can produce additional electrical power at a hub, i.e. central collection point, and has lower specific costs compared to decentralized CHPs at digester sites. A biogas transport model is used to calculate transport costs in a grid. These costs, partly balanced by a scale advantage in CHP costs, are attributed to the additional electrical energy (80%) and heat (20%) produced. If the hub is at a digester site, costs of additional electricity can be as low as 4.0 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1) and are in many cases below 12 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1), i.e. in the same order of magnitude or lower than costs of electricity from biogas produced using separate CHPs at the different digester sites; costs of heat at the hub show to be lower than 1 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1) assuming an effective heat use of 50%. In case a hub is situated at a location with high potential heat demand, i.e. a heat sink, transport of biogas from one digester only to a central located hub can provide 3.4 MWth of heat at 1.95 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1). For such a centrally located hub additional electrical energy costs show to be slightly higher, but with three or more digesters these costs are lower than 20 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1) and heat costs are around 0.5 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1). With a centralized hub more renewable energy is produced, i.e. a more efficient use of biomass feedstock. It is concluded that costs for additional electricity and heat can be at a competing level and scale advantages in a CHP can be a driver to collect biogas at a hub using a biogas grid.
Notes: Hengeveld, EJ (reprint author), POB 3037, NL-9701 DA Groningen, Netherlands.
e.j.hengeveld@pl.hanze.nl; j.bekkering@pl.hanze.nl;
miet.vandael@vito.be; w.j.t.van.gemert@pl.hanze.nl; a.a.broekhuis@rug.nl
Other: Hengeveld, EJ (reprint author), POB 3037, NL-9701 DA Groningen, Netherlands. e.j.hengeveld@pl.hanze.nl; j.bekkering@pl.hanze.nl; miet.vandael@vito.be; w.j.t.van.gemert@pl.hanze.nl; a.a.broekhuis@rug.nl
Keywords: Biogas CHP;Scale dependency;Electrical efficiency;Biogas transport;Biogas grid;Centralized processing
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31185
ISSN: 0960-1481
e-ISSN: 1879-0682
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.009
ISI #: WOS:000517856500046
Rights: 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2021
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hengeveld_E.J..pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.