Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31202
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | DE MOT, Jef | - |
dc.contributor.author | Miceli, Thomas | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-25T12:04:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-25T12:04:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-04-30T13:31:59Z | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Review of law & economics (Print), 11 (1) , p. 1 -17 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31202 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper compares the all-or-nothing and proportionate damage rules for allocating damages in tort cases under evidentiary uncertainty. The focus is on how the two rules affect litigation expenditures by plaintiffs and defendants. The results of simulation experiments show that the expected judgment at trial is higher under the all-or-nothing rule for cases where the defendant did not take adequate care, but the judgment is higher under the proportionate rule when the defendant took more than adequate care. As for litigation expenditures, assuming equal costs of litigation, overall expenditures are higher under the all-or-nothing rule, except for very weak and very strong cases. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH | - |
dc.subject.other | All-or-nothing rule | - |
dc.subject.other | proportionate damages | - |
dc.subject.other | litigation costs | - |
dc.subject.other | rentseeking | - |
dc.title | Comparing All-or-Nothing and Proportionate Damages: A Rent-Seeking Approach | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 17 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.publisher.place | GENTHINER STRASSE 13, D-10785 BERLIN, GERMANY | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
dc.source.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/rle-2014-0058 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000443433200001 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | - | |
local.provider.type | Web of Science | - |
local.uhasselt.uhpub | no | - |
item.accessRights | Closed Access | - |
item.contributor | DE MOT, Jef | - |
item.contributor | Miceli, Thomas | - |
item.fullcitation | DE MOT, Jef & Miceli, Thomas (2015) Comparing All-or-Nothing and Proportionate Damages: A Rent-Seeking Approach. In: Review of law & economics (Print), 11 (1) , p. 1 -17. | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 2194-6000 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1555-5879 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Sep 5, 2020
Page view(s)
22
checked on Aug 1, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.