Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31397
Title: Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study
Authors: Hommels, T. M.
Hermanides, R. S.
Rasoul, S.
Berta, B.
IJsselmuiden, A. J. J.
Jessurun, G. A. J.
BENIT, Edouard 
Pereira, B.
De Luca, G.
Kedhi, E.
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: BMC
Source: Cardiovascular diabetology (Online), 18 (1) (Art N° 25)
Abstract: BackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains challenging even with modern drug-eluting stents (DES) due to high rates of repeat revascularization. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (EE-BRS) might allow for repeat intervention prolonging the time interval of percutaneous treatment options.MethodsThe ABSORB DM Benelux Study is a dedicated prospective, international study to evaluate the midterm safety and efficacy of EE-BRS in DM patients. All DM patients that received1 EE-BRS for any indication were enrolled and prospectively followed. Study endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR); target lesion failure (TLF): a composite of cardiac death (CD), target vessel MI, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), as well as definite or probable scaffold thrombosis (ScT).ResultsBetween April 2015 till March 2017, 150 DM patients and 188 lesions were treated and followed up to 3years. Device implantation success was 100%. MACE occurred in 15.2% (event rate of 8.8 per 100 PY). TLF was reported in 11.7% (7.0 events per 100 PY). CD, target vessel MI, ischemic-driven TLR occurred in 3.4%, 3.6% and 5.5% respectively, while ScT was observed in 1.4%. There were no occurrences of late or very late ScT.ConclusionEE-BRS treatment in DM patients shows comparable midterm safety and efficacy outcomes when historically compared with modern DES. New-generation EE-BRS might offer an attractive alternative to metallic DES in treatment of fast progressing atherosclerosis population as in DM patients.Trial registration NTR5447. Registered 05 October 2015, retrospectively registered
Notes: Kedhi, E (reprint author), Dokter Heesweg 2,Postbus 10400, NL-8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands.
e.kedhi@Isala.nl
Keywords: Bioresorbable scaffold; Diabetes mellitus; Coronary artery disease;;Percutaneous coronary intervention; Scaffold thrombosis
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31397
e-ISSN: 1475-2840
DOI: 10.1186/s12933-019-0827-z
ISI #: WOS:000460686900001
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12933-019-0827-z.pdfPublished version788.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Apr 21, 2024

Page view(s)

38
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

8
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.