Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31432
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRakocevic, Lucija-
dc.contributor.authorErnst, Felix-
dc.contributor.authorYimga, Nadine T.-
dc.contributor.authorVashishtha, Saumye-
dc.contributor.authorAERNOUTS, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorHeumueller, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorBrabec, Christoph J.-
dc.contributor.authorGehlhaar, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorPOORTMANS, Jef-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T12:05:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-07T12:05:11Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.date.submitted2020-07-06T13:20:09Z-
dc.identifier.citationSolar RRL (online), 3 (2) (Art N° 1800287)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/31432-
dc.description.abstractPerformance comparison of perovskite solar cells with different architectures is nontrivial. J-V sweeps can be unreliable due to stack-dependent output variations affected by sample preconditioning, scan rate, scan direction, and temperature. Maximum power point tracking is regarded as a more reliable performance measurement. In this study, a two-step measuring procedure is proposed for quick and unbiased comparison of perovskite-based solar cells. In the proposed procedure, the transient current density characterization step is used to determine optimal parameters for maximum power point tracking performance characterization. Moreover, factors affecting time limited maximum power point tracking by comparing performance and output of three different maximum power point tracking algorithms applied to devices, from three planar n-i-p perovskite stacks, are analyzed and identified. Numerical simulation is used to model differences and define limitations of the algorithms. As a result, it is shown that measurement delay and voltage step can have a crucial effect on maximum power point tracking output, regardless of the chosen algorithm.-
dc.description.sponsorshipSolliance; ERDF through SolSThore project under EnergyVille; Flemish research institutions KU Leuven; Imec; European Regional Development Fund through PVopMaat project within the Interreg V program Flanders-Netherlands-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH-
dc.rights2019 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.-
dc.subject.othermeasurement procedures-
dc.subject.otherperovskite solar cells-
dc.titleReliable Performance Comparison of Perovskite Solar Cells Using Optimized Maximum Power Point Tracking-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.volume3-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesRakocevic, L (reprint author), Imec Partner Solliance, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.-
dc.description.noteslucija.rakocevic@imec.be-
local.publisher.placePOSTFACH 101161, 69451 WEINHEIM, GERMANY-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr1800287-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/solr.201800287-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000459580400011-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationRakocevic, Lucija; Ernst, Felix; Yimga, Nadine T.; Vashishtha, Saumye; AERNOUTS, Tom; Heumueller, Thomas; Brabec, Christoph J.; Gehlhaar, Robert & POORTMANS, Jef (2019) Reliable Performance Comparison of Perovskite Solar Cells Using Optimized Maximum Power Point Tracking. In: Solar RRL (online), 3 (2) (Art N° 1800287).-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorRakocevic, Lucija-
item.contributorErnst, Felix-
item.contributorYimga, Nadine T.-
item.contributorVashishtha, Saumye-
item.contributorAERNOUTS, Tom-
item.contributorHeumueller, Thomas-
item.contributorBrabec, Christoph J.-
item.contributorGehlhaar, Robert-
item.contributorPOORTMANS, Jef-
crisitem.journal.issn2367-198X-
crisitem.journal.eissn2367-198X-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rakocevic_Lucija_2019.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 7, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

33
checked on May 16, 2024

Page view(s)

20
checked on Jul 14, 2022

Download(s)

2
checked on Jul 14, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.