Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31480
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCAROLUS, Jorne-
dc.contributor.authorBREUGELMANS, Robbe-
dc.contributor.authorTsanakas, John-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DER HEIDE, Arvid-
dc.contributor.authorVoroshazi, Eszter-
dc.contributor.authorDE CEUNINCK, Ward-
dc.contributor.authorDAENEN, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-28T09:44:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-28T09:44:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2020-06-19T15:09:05Z-
dc.identifier.citationProgress in Photovoltaics, 28(10), p. 1045-1053-
dc.identifier.issn1062-7995-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/31480-
dc.description.abstractRecent research has shown that bifacial PV modules with a glass/glass packaging are prone to different PID mechanisms occurring simultaneously on the front and the rear side of the solar cell. With this in mind, researchers investigating the impact of PID on each side of the bifacial solar cell separately apply PID stress to one side of bifacial PV modules according to stress method (b) as described in the IEC TS 62804-1, that is, contacting the surface with a conductive electrode. Yet, in this paper, we show that such practice of PID testing might result in an unintended development of an electric field between the environmental chamber and the nonstressed side of the solar cell. Through our experimental study, we reveal that this electric field results in unintended bifacial PID stress of bifacial solar cells, which goes along with misleading interpretations of the evolving PID mechanisms and susceptibility of bifacial PV modules. Next to the methodology concerns, we discuss three possible solutions to prevent such unintended PID mechanisms from occurring.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWILEY-
dc.rights© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.-
dc.subject.otherComplete List of Authors: Carolus, Jorne-
dc.subject.otherBreugelmans, Robbe-
dc.subject.otherHasselt University-
dc.subject.otherIMEC Tsanakas, John-
dc.subject.otherIMEC, Department of Photovoltaics van der Heide, Arvid-
dc.subject.otherIMEC, Department of Photovoltaics Voroshazi, Eszter-
dc.subject.otherimec, PV De Ceuninck, Ward-
dc.subject.otherIMEC-
dc.subject.otherHasselt University Daenen, Michael-
dc.subject.otherIMEC Keywords: Crystalline silicon solar cells, n-PERT bifacial solar cells, photovoltaic (PV) module reliability, potential-induced degradation (PID), testing methods-
dc.titleWhy and how to adapt PID testing for bifacial PV modules?-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1053-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage1045-
dc.identifier.volume28-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.type.programmeH2020-
local.relation.h2020752117-
dc.source.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pip.3311-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000547612000001-
dc.identifier.eissn1099-159X-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
item.validationecoom 2021-
item.contributorCAROLUS, Jorne-
item.contributorBREUGELMANS, Robbe-
item.contributorTsanakas, John-
item.contributorVAN DER HEIDE, Arvid-
item.contributorVoroshazi, Eszter-
item.contributorDE CEUNINCK, Ward-
item.contributorDAENEN, Michael-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationCAROLUS, Jorne; BREUGELMANS, Robbe; Tsanakas, John; VAN DER HEIDE, Arvid; Voroshazi, Eszter; DE CEUNINCK, Ward & DAENEN, Michael (2020) Why and how to adapt PID testing for bifacial PV modules?. In: Progress in Photovoltaics, 28(10), p. 1045-1053.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1062-7995-
crisitem.journal.eissn1099-159X-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on May 4, 2024

Page view(s)

44
checked on Mar 29, 2022

Download(s)

30
checked on Mar 29, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.