Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31619
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVAN POUCKE, Sven-
dc.contributor.authorTHOMEER, Michiel-
dc.contributor.authorHeath, John-
dc.contributor.authorVukicevic, Milan-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T12:47:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-07T12:47:50Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.date.submitted2020-08-04T08:26:39Z-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 18 (7) (Art N° e185)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/31619-
dc.description.abstractDespite the accelerating pace of scientific discovery, the current clinical research enterprise does not sufficiently address pressing clinical questions. Given the constraints on clinical trials, for a majority of clinical questions, the only relevant data available to aid in decision making are based on observation and experience. Our purpose here is 3-fold. First, we describe the classic context of medical research guided by Poppers' scientific epistemology of "falsificationism." Second, we discuss challenges and shortcomings of randomized controlled trials and present the potential of observational studies based on big data. Third, we cover several obstacles related to the use of observational (retrospective) data in clinical studies. We conclude that randomized controlled trials are not at risk for extinction, but innovations in statistics, machine learning, and big data analytics may generate a completely new ecosystem for exploration and validation.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherJMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC-
dc.subject.otheralgorithm-
dc.subject.otherbig data-
dc.subject.otherdata mining-
dc.subject.otherensemble methods-
dc.subject.othermodeling-
dc.subject.otherpredictive analytics-
dc.subject.otherrandomized controlled trials-
dc.subject.otherBiomedical Research-
dc.subject.otherData Mining-
dc.subject.otherDecision Making-
dc.subject.otherHumans-
dc.subject.otherIntelligence-
dc.subject.otherObservational Studies as Topic-
dc.subject.otherRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic-
dc.titleAre Randomized Controlled Trials the (G)old Standard? From Clinical Intelligence to Prescriptive Analytics-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.volume18-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place130 QUEENS QUAY E, STE 1102, TORONTO, ON M5A 0P6, CANADA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnre185-
local.classIncludeIn-ExcludeFrom-List/ExcludeFromFRIS-
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/jmir.5549-
dc.identifier.pmid27383622-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000388495600001-
local.provider.typePubMed-
item.fullcitationVAN POUCKE, Sven; THOMEER, Michiel; Heath, John & Vukicevic, Milan (2016) Are Randomized Controlled Trials the (G)old Standard? From Clinical Intelligence to Prescriptive Analytics. In: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 18 (7) (Art N° e185).-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.contributorVAN POUCKE, Sven-
item.contributorTHOMEER, Michiel-
item.contributorHeath, John-
item.contributorVukicevic, Milan-
crisitem.journal.issn1438-8871-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on May 16, 2024

Page view(s)

38
checked on Jul 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.