Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31787
Title: Distal biceps tendon repair: comparison of clinical and radiological outcome between bioabsorbable and nonabsorbable screws
Authors: CAEKEBEKE, Pieter 
CORTEN, Kristoff 
DUERINCKX, Joris 
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: MOSBY-ELSEVIER
Source: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 25 (3) , p. 349 -354
Abstract: Distal biceps tendon repair to the radial tuberosity can be conducted by means of an interference screw in combination with a transosseous button. Bioabsorbable interference screws have been associated with complications such as severe osteolytic reactions. We questioned whether patients with a distal biceps tendon repair with bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) screws had different functional, clinical, and radiologic outcome than patients with nonabsorbable poly-ether ether ketone (PEEK) screws.
Background: Distal biceps tendon repair to the radial tuberosity can be conducted by means of an interference screw in combination with a transosseous button. Bioabsorbable interference screws have been associated with complications such as severe osteolytic reactions. We questioned whether patients with a distal biceps tendon repair with bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide (PLLA) screws had different functional, clinical, and radiologic outcome than patients with nonabsorbable poly-ether ether ketone (PEEK) screws.Methods: Between 2010 and 2014, 23 patients with an acute distal biceps tendon rupture were treated with reinsertion of the distal biceps tendon in a bone tunnel at the radial tuberosity through a single anterior incision using a transosseous button combined with an interference screw. A PLLA screw was used in 12 patients and a PEEK screw in 11 patients. All patients were retrospectively evaluated with a minimal follow-up of 1 year clinically and by means of the visual analog scale for pain, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure score. Bone tunnel volume was measured with computed tomography segmentation.Results: Elbow mobility and arm and forearm circumference were symmetric for all patients. The visual analog scale for pain was 0.2 in the PLLA group and 0.7 in the PEEK group. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were 5.4 and 98.7 in the PLLA group vs. 3.1 and 95.9 in the PEEK group. Bone tunnel enlargement of 43% in the PLLA and 38% in the PEEK group was noted.Conclusions: Clinical and functional outcome at more than 1 year after distal biceps tendon repair was excellent in both groups. Bone tunnel widening occurred in all patients. (C) 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees
Keywords: Biceps tendon;PEEK;PLLA;interference;osteolysis;repair;Elbow Joint;Female;Humans;Male;Middle Aged;Muscle, Skeletal;Orthopedic Procedures;Radiography;Range of Motion, Articular;Retrospective Studies;Rupture;Tendon Injuries;Tendons;Treatment Outcome;Absorbable Implants
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31787
ISSN: 1058-2746
e-ISSN: 1532-6500
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.007
ISI #: WOS:000371259900008
Rights: 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1058274615007260-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version931.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Sep 7, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on Oct 4, 2024

Page view(s)

30
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.