Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31914
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Schreurs, Sonja | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Vanreppelen, Kenny | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Cuypers, Ann | - |
dc.contributor.author | HAELDERMANS, Tom | - |
dc.contributor.author | CAMPION, Luca | - |
dc.contributor.author | KUPPENS, Tom | - |
dc.contributor.author | VANREPPELEN, Kenny | - |
dc.contributor.author | CUYPERS, Ann | - |
dc.contributor.author | SCHREURS, Sonja | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-16T12:05:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-16T12:05:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-09-14T07:31:57Z | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Bioresource technology, 318 (Art N° 124083) | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-8524 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/31914 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A comparative techno-economic assessment and Monte Carlo risk analysis is performed on large scale (3 tonne/h) biochar production plants for conventional (CPS) and microwave (MWP) pyrolysis using six different residue streams. Both plants are viable with minimum selling prices between € 436/tonne and € 863/tonne for CPS, and between € 564/tonne and € 979/tonne for MWP. The CPS is therefore more viable than MWP as it is a simpler and more established technology. However, a 20 % biochar price increase due to higher biochar quality makes the MWP technology more viable. Nevertheless, the discounted payback period remains higher than this of CPS due to the increased CAPEX. Biochar price is the most important determinant of a biochar production plant’s feasibility, motivating the need for economic and market research on biochar prices in function of biochar characteristics to reduce fluctuations in widely varying biochar prices. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by Vlaams Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen (VLAIO) and European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) [BM20160604]. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | - | |
dc.rights | 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.subject.other | Conventional pyrolysis | - |
dc.subject.other | Microwave pyrolysis | - |
dc.subject.other | Economics | - |
dc.subject.other | Biochar | - |
dc.subject.other | Techno-economic assessment | - |
dc.title | A comparative techno-economic assessment of biochar production from different residue streams using conventional and microwave pyrolysis | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 318 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.publisher.place | THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr | 124083 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124083 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000593738900007 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | - | |
local.provider.type | - | |
local.uhasselt.uhpub | yes | - |
local.uhasselt.international | no | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2022 | - |
item.accessRights | Restricted Access | - |
item.fullcitation | HAELDERMANS, Tom; CAMPION, Luca; KUPPENS, Tom; VANREPPELEN, Kenny; CUYPERS, Ann & SCHREURS, Sonja (2020) A comparative techno-economic assessment of biochar production from different residue streams using conventional and microwave pyrolysis. In: Bioresource technology, 318 (Art N° 124083). | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.contributor | HAELDERMANS, Tom | - |
item.contributor | CAMPION, Luca | - |
item.contributor | KUPPENS, Tom | - |
item.contributor | VANREPPELEN, Kenny | - |
item.contributor | CUYPERS, Ann | - |
item.contributor | SCHREURS, Sonja | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 0960-8524 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1873-2976 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 1.57 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.