Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32685
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGheyssens, E-
dc.contributor.authorConsuegra, E-
dc.contributor.authorVansambrouck, S-
dc.contributor.authorEngels, N-
dc.contributor.authorSTRUYVEN, Katrien-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-24T11:07:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-24T11:07:21Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2020-11-23T11:22:23Z-
dc.identifier.citationPedagogische studiën, 97 (3) , p. 163 -186 (Art N° 97)-
dc.identifier.issn0165-0645-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/32685-
dc.description.abstractDifferentiated instruction (DI) is put forward as a pedagogical approach to create an inclusive classroom and is considered both a teaching philosophy and a teaching praxis. DI requires that teachers adapt their teaching to students' interests, readiness and learning profiles by adopting differentiated practices such as flexible grouping and ongoing assessment. However, several studies report implementation challenges for DI practices. Using mixed methods, this study explores to what degree differentiated practices are implemented by primary school teachers in Flanders (Belgium). Data were gathered by means of three different methods, which are compared: teachers' self-reported questionnaires (N=513), observed classroom practices and recall interviews with 14 teachers. The results reveal that there is not always congruence between the observed and self-reported practices. Moreover, the study seeks to understand what encourages or discourages teachers to implement DI practices. It turns out that concerns about the impact on students and school policy are referred to by teachers as impediments when it comes to adopting differentiated practices in classrooms.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors of this study gratefully acknowledge the support of the POTENTIAL research and valorisation project (www.potentialproject.be), funded by the Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (VLAIO). We would also like to thank the participating teachers for allowing us into their classrooms.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherVereniging voor Onderwijsresearch (VOR) in samenwerking met het Vlaams Forum voor Onderwijsonderzoek-
dc.subject.otherdifferentiated instruction-
dc.subject.otherprimary education-
dc.subject.othermixed method-
dc.subject.otherDI-Quest instrument-
dc.titleDifferentiated instruction in practice: do teachers walk the talk?-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage186-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage163-
dc.identifier.volume97-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.otherOpgenomen in de Social Sience Citation Index®-
local.publisher.placeP/A EINDHOVEN SCH EDUC, DR P DEN BROK, POSTBUS 513, EINDHOVEN, 5600 MB, NETHERLANDS-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr97-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000595146900002-
dc.identifier.eissn0165-0645-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationGheyssens, E; Consuegra, E; Vansambrouck, S; Engels, N & STRUYVEN, Katrien (2020) Differentiated instruction in practice: do teachers walk the talk?. In: Pedagogische studiën, 97 (3) , p. 163 -186 (Art N° 97).-
item.validationecoom 2022-
item.contributorGheyssens, E-
item.contributorConsuegra, E-
item.contributorVansambrouck, S-
item.contributorEngels, N-
item.contributorSTRUYVEN, Katrien-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0165-0645-
crisitem.journal.eissn0165-0645-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Jul 21, 2024

Page view(s)

86
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

14
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.