Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32873
Title: Early access to antiretroviral therapy versus standard of care among HIV‐positive participants in Eswatini in the public health sector: the MaxART stepped‐wedge randomized controlled trial
Authors: Khan, Shaukat
Spiegelman, Donna
Walsh, Fiona
Mazibuko, Sikhatele
Pasipamire, Munyaradzi
Chai, Boyang
Reis, Ria
Mlambo, Khudzie
DELVA, Wim 
Khumalo, Gavin
Zwane, Mandisa
Fleming, Yvette
Mafara, Emma
Hettema, Anita
Lejeune, Charlotte
Chao, Ariel
Baernighausen, Till
Okello, Velephi
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
Source: Journal of the International AIDS Society, 23 (9) (Art N° e25610)
Abstract: Introduction The WHO recommends antiretroviral treatment (ART) for all HIV-positive patients regardless of CD4 count or disease stage, referred to as "Early Access to ART for All" (EAAA). The health systems effects of EAAA implementation are unknown. This trial was implemented in a government-managed public health system with the aim to examine the "real world" impact of EAAA on care retention and viral suppression. Methods In this stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial, 14 public sector health facilities in Eswatini were paired and randomly assigned to stepwise transition from standard of care (SoC) to EAAA. ART-naive participants >= 18 years who were not pregnant or breastfeeding were eligible for enrolment. We used Cox proportional hazard models with censoring at clinic transition to estimate the effects of EAAA on retention in care and retention and viral suppression combined. Results Between September 2014 and August 2017, 3405 participants were enrolled. In SoC and EAAA respectively, 12-month HIV care retention rates were 80% (95% CI: 77 to 83) and 86% (95% CI: 83 to 88). The 12-month combined retention and viral suppression endpoint rates were 44% (95% CI: 40 to 48) under SoC compared to 80% (95% CI: 77 to 83) under EAAA. EAAA increased both retention (HR: 1 center dot 60, 95% CI: 1 center dot 15 to 2 center dot 21,p = 0.005) and retention and viral suppression combined (HR: 4.88, 95% CI: 2.96 to 8.05,p < 0.001). We also identified significant gaps in current health systems ability to provide viral load (VL) monitoring with 80% participants in SoC and 66% in EAAA having a missing VL at last contact. Conclusions The observed improvement in retention in care and on the combined retention and viral suppression provides an important co-benefit of EAAA to HIV-positive adults themselves, at least in the short term. Our results from this "real world" health systems trial strongly support EAAA for Eswatini and countries with similar HIV epidemics and health systems. VL monitoring needs to be scaled up for appropriate care management.
Notes: Spiegelman, D (corresponding author), Yale Sch Publ Hlth, 60 Coll St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA.
donna.spiegelman@yale.edu
Other: Spiegelman, D (corresponding author), Yale Sch Publ Hlth, 60 Coll St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA. donna.spiegelman@yale.edu
Keywords: universal treatment;HIV retention;viral suppression;Eswatini;Sub-Saharan Africa;antiretroviral therapy
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32873
e-ISSN: 1758-2652
DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25610
ISI #: WOS:000576528600002
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2021
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jia2.25610.pdfPublished version719.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

30
checked on Jun 21, 2022

Download(s)

8
checked on Jun 21, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.