Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/32914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPawlik, Malgorzata-
dc.contributor.authorPlociniczak, Tomasz-
dc.contributor.authorTHIJS, Sofie-
dc.contributor.authorPintelon, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorVANGRONSVELD, Jaco-
dc.contributor.authorPiotrowska-Seget, Zofia-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-15T07:23:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-15T07:23:22Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2020-11-18T12:39:28Z-
dc.identifier.citationAGRONOMY-BASEL, 10 (8) (Art N° 1196)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/32914-
dc.description.abstractEndophyte-enhanced phytodegradation is a promising technology to clean up polluted soils. To improve the success rate of this nature-based remediation approach, it is important to advance the inoculation method as this has been shown to strongly affect the final outcome. However, studies evaluating inoculation strategies and their effect on hydrocarbon degradation are limited. This study aims to investigate two different manners of endophyte inoculation inLolium perennegrowing in an aged petroleum hydrocarbon polluted soil: (1) direct soil inoculation (SI), and (2) pre-inoculation of the caryopses followed by soil inoculation (PI). Different endophytic bacterial strains,Rhodococcus erythropolis5WK andRhizobiumsp. 10WK, were applied individually as well as in combination. Depending on the method of inoculation, the petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) degradation potential was significantly different. The highest PHC removal was achieved after pre-inoculation of ryegrass caryopses with a consortium of both bacterial strains. Moreover, both strains established in the aged-polluted soil and could also colonize the roots and shoots ofL. perenne. Importantly, used endophytes showed the selective colonization of the environment compartments. Our findings show that the method of inoculation determines the efficiency of the phytodegradation process, especially the rate of PHC degradation. This study provides valuable information for choosing the most cost-effective and beneficial means to optimize phytodegradation.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was financed by the National Science Centre grant 2013/09/N/NZ9/01606. This research was supported by a BOF-BILA grant from Hasselt University, the UHasselt Methusalem project 08M03VGRJ. M. Pawlik was a scholarship holder within the DoktoRIS project-scholarship program for the innovation of the Silesia region, supported by the European Community from the European Social Fund.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.rights2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.subject.otherendophytic bacteria-
dc.subject.otherphytoremediation-
dc.subject.otherpetroleum hydrocarbon polluted soil-
dc.subject.otherinoculation-
dc.subject.otherpre-inoculation-
dc.subject.othergreen fluorescent protein-
dc.subject.otherplant growth-promoting bacteria-
dc.titleComparison of Two Inoculation Methods of Endophytic Bacteria to Enhance Phytodegradation Efficacy of an Aged Petroleum Hydrocarbons Polluted Soil-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.volume10-
local.format.pages16-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesPawlik, M (corresponding author), Univ Silesia Katowice, Fac Nat Sci, Inst Biol Biotechnol & Environm Protect, Jagiellonska 28, PL-40032 Katowice, Poland.-
dc.description.notesmalgorzata.pawlik@us.edu.pl; tomasz.plociniczak@us.edu.pl;-
dc.description.notessofie.thijs@uhasselt.be; isabel.pintelon@uantwerpen.be;-
dc.description.notesjaco.vangronsveld@uhasselt.be; zofia.piotrowska-seget@us.edu.pl-
dc.description.otherPawlik, M (corresponding author), Univ Silesia Katowice, Fac Nat Sci, Inst Biol Biotechnol & Environm Protect, Jagiellonska 28, PL-40032 Katowice, Poland. malgorzata.pawlik@us.edu.pl; tomasz.plociniczak@us.edu.pl; sofie.thijs@uhasselt.be; isabel.pintelon@uantwerpen.be; jaco.vangronsveld@uhasselt.be; zofia.piotrowska-seget@us.edu.pl-
local.publisher.placeST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr1196-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy10081196-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000567295000001-
dc.contributor.orcidVangronsveld, Jaco/0000-0003-4423-8363; Piotrowska-Seget,-
dc.contributor.orcidZofia/0000-0002-9039-2268-
dc.identifier.eissn-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.description.affiliation[Pawlik, Malgorzata; Plociniczak, Tomasz; Piotrowska-Seget, Zofia] Univ Silesia Katowice, Fac Nat Sci, Inst Biol Biotechnol & Environm Protect, Jagiellonska 28, PL-40032 Katowice, Poland.-
local.description.affiliation[Thijs, Sofie; Vangronsveld, Jaco] Hasselt Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, Agoralaan Bldg D, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Pintelon, Isabel] Univ Antwerp, Lab Cell Biol & Histol, Campus Drie Eiken,Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorPawlik, Malgorzata-
item.contributorPlociniczak, Tomasz-
item.contributorTHIJS, Sofie-
item.contributorPintelon, Isabel-
item.contributorVANGRONSVELD, Jaco-
item.contributorPiotrowska-Seget, Zofia-
item.fullcitationPawlik, Malgorzata; Plociniczak, Tomasz; THIJS, Sofie; Pintelon, Isabel; VANGRONSVELD, Jaco & Piotrowska-Seget, Zofia (2020) Comparison of Two Inoculation Methods of Endophytic Bacteria to Enhance Phytodegradation Efficacy of an Aged Petroleum Hydrocarbons Polluted Soil. In: AGRONOMY-BASEL, 10 (8) (Art N° 1196).-
item.validationecoom 2021-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn2073-4395-
crisitem.journal.eissn2073-4395-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
agronomy-10-01196.pdfPublished version2.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Aug 11, 2024

Page view(s)

36
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

14
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.