Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33333
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTHIN, Sarah-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-09T10:43:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-09T10:43:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-02-08T11:04:17Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/33333-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleThe Curious Case of the ‘Legal Effect’ of ICJ Advisory Opinions in the Mauritius/Maldives Maritime Boundary Dispute-
dc.typeOther-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatO-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedWeb Content-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ejiltalk.org/the-curious-case-of-the-legal-effect-of-icj-advisory-opinions-in-the-mauritius-maldives-maritime-boundary-dispute/-
local.uhasselt.uhpubno-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.contributorTHIN, Sarah-
item.fullcitationTHIN, Sarah (2021) The Curious Case of the ‘Legal Effect’ of ICJ Advisory Opinions in the Mauritius/Maldives Maritime Boundary Dispute.-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.