Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33336
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGECK, Gaetano-
dc.contributor.authorNEVEN, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorSchwentick, Thomas-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-09T14:46:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-09T14:46:33Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2021-02-05T18:00:18Z-
dc.identifier.citationLutz, Carsten; Jung, Jean Christoph (Ed.). Proceedingsbook 23rd International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2020), p. 13:1 -13:19 (Art N° 13)-
dc.identifier.issn1868-8969-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/33336-
dc.description.abstractDistributed storage and processing of data has been used and studied since the 1970s and became more and more important in the recent past. One of the most fundamental questions in distributed data management is the following: how should data be replicated and partitioned over the set of computing nodes? It is paramount to answer this question well as the placement of data determines the reliability of the system and is furthermore critical for its scalability including the performance of query processing. On the one hand, despite the importance of this question and decades of research, the placement strategies remained rather simple for a long time: horizontal or vertical fragmentation of relations – or hybrid variants thereof [37]. These placement strategies often require a reshuffling of the data for each binary join in the processed query which are commonly based on a range or hash partitioning of the relevant attributes. Recently, however, more elaborated schemes of data placement like co-partitioning, single hypercubes (for multiwayjoins) or multiple hypercubes (for skewed data) gained some attention [3, 12, 30, 39, 41, 45].-
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Michael Benedikt, Bas Ketsman, Andreas Pieris, Phokion Kolaitis, Christopher Spinrath, Brecht Vandevoort, and Thomas Zeume for helpful discussions on various aspects of this work-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLeibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)-
dc.rightsGaetano Geck, Frank Neven, and Thomas Schwentick; licensed under Creative Commons License CC-BY-
dc.subject.othertuple-generating dependencies-
dc.subject.otherchase-
dc.subject.otherconjunctive queries-
dc.subject.otherdistributed evaluation-
dc.titleDistribution Constraints: The Chase for Distributed Data-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsLutz, Carsten-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsJung, Jean Christoph-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename23rd International Conference on Database Theory-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceCopenhagen-
dc.identifier.epage13:19-
dc.identifier.spage13:1-
local.format.pages19-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr13-
dc.identifier.doi10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2020.13-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProceedingsbook 23rd International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2020)-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.fullcitationGECK, Gaetano; NEVEN, Frank & Schwentick, Thomas (2020) Distribution Constraints: The Chase for Distributed Data. In: Lutz, Carsten; Jung, Jean Christoph (Ed.). Proceedingsbook 23rd International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2020), p. 13:1 -13:19 (Art N° 13).-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationvabb 2024-
item.contributorGECK, Gaetano-
item.contributorNEVEN, Frank-
item.contributorSchwentick, Thomas-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LIPIcs-ICDT-2020-13.pdfPublished version703.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.