Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33446
Title: Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects
Authors: SONG, Dandan 
Shujaat, Sohaib
de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla
Huang, Yan
POLITIS, Constantinus 
LAMBRICHTS, Ivo 
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: 
Source: BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 21 (1), (Art N° 23).
Abstract: Background: Early detection of marginal bone loss is vital for treatment planning and prognosis of teeth and implant. This study was conducted to assess diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to intra-oral (IO) radiography for detection, classification, and measurement of peri-implant bone defects in an animal model. Methods: Fifty-four mandible blocks with implants were harvested from nine male health adult beagle dogs with acquisition of IO, CBCT and micro-CT images from all samples. Peri-implant bone defects from 16 samples were diagnosed using micro-CT and classified into 3 defect categories: dehiscence (n = 5), infrabony defect (n = 3) and crater-like defect (n = 8). Following training and calibration of the observers, they asked to detect location (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) and shape of the defect (dehiscence, horizontal defect, vertical defect, carter-like defect) utilizing both IO and CBCT images. Both observers assessed defect depth and width on IO, CBCT and micro-CT images at each side of peri-implant bone defect via CT-analyzer software. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and a p value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Overall, there was a high diagnostic accuracy for detection of bone defects with CBCT images (sensitivity: 100%/100%), while IO images showed a reduction in accuracy (sensitivity: 69%/63%). Similarly, diagnostic accuracy for defect classification was significantly higher for CBCT, whereas IO images were unable to correctly identify vestibular dehiscence, with incorrect assessment of half of the infrabony defects. For accuracy of measuring defect depth and width, a higher correlation was observed between CBCT and gold standard micro-CT (r = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.94), whereas a lower correlation was seen for IO images (r = 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-0.91). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy and reliability of CBCT was found to be superior to IO imaging for the detection , classification, and measurement of peri-implant bone defects. The application of CBCT adds substantial information related to the peri-implant bone defect diagnosis and decision-making which cannot be achieved with conventional IO imaging.
Keywords: Alveolar bone loss;Peri-implantitis;CBCT;Dental radiography
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33446
ISSN: 1471-2342
e-ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00557-9
ISI #: 000619652400003
Rights: The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1186_s12880-021-00557-9.pdfPublished version1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

28
checked on Jun 14, 2022

Download(s)

12
checked on Jun 14, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.