Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33776
Title: | Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers' opinions on success indicators | Authors: | AUBERT BONN, Noemie PINXTEN, Wim |
Editors: | Amaral, Luís A. Nunes | Issue Date: | 2021 | Publisher: | PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE | Source: | PLoS One, 16 (2) (Art N° e0243664) | Abstract: | The way in which we assess researchers has been under the radar in the past few years. Critics argue that current research assessments focus on productivity and that they increase unhealthy pressures on scientists. Yet, the precise ways in which assessments should change is still open for debate. We circulated a survey with Flemish researchers to understand how they work, and how they would rate the relevance of specific indicators used in research assessments. We found that most researchers worked far beyond their expected working schedule. We also found that, although they spent most of their time doing research, respondents wished they could dedicate more time to it and spend less time writing grants and performing other activities such as administrative duties and meetings. When looking at success indicators, we found that indicators related to openness, transparency, quality, and innovation were perceived as highly important in advancing science, but as relatively overlooked in career advancement. Conversely, indicators which denoted of prestige and competition were generally rated as important to career advancement, but irrelevant or even detrimental in advancing science. Open comments from respondents further revealed that, although indicators which indicate openness, transparency, and quality (e.g., publishing open access, publishing negative findings, sharing data, etc.) should ultimately be valued more in research assessments, the resources and support currently in place were insufficient to allow researchers to endorse such practices. In other words, current research assessments are inadequate and ignore practices which are essential in contributing to the advancement of science. Yet, before we change the way in which researchers are being assessed, supporting infrastructures must be put in place to ensure that researchers are able to commit to the activities that may benefit the advancement of science. | Notes: | Bonn, NA (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Healthcare & Ethics Res Grp, Fac Med & Life Sci, Hasselt, Belgium. noemie.aubertbonn@uhasselt.be |
Other: | Bonn, NA (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Healthcare & Ethics Res Grp, Fac Med & Life Sci, Hasselt, Belgium. noemie.aubertbonn@uhasselt.be | Keywords: | Female;Humans;Male;Peer Review, Research;Research Support as Topic;Science;Workload;Career Mobility;Research Personnel | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33776 | ISSN: | 1932-6203 | e-ISSN: | 1932-6203 | DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0243664 | ISI #: | WOS:000620071100001 | Rights: | 2021 Aubert Bonn, Pinxten. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | ecoom 2022 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
journal.pone.0243664.pdf | Published version | 1.33 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
15
checked on Oct 13, 2024
Page view(s)
30
checked on Sep 5, 2022
Download(s)
14
checked on Sep 5, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.