Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33815
Title: Pulmonary rehabilitation to improve physical capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life following pulmonary embolism (the PeRehab study): study protocol for a two-center randomized controlled trial
Authors: Haukeland-Parker, Stacey
Jervan, Oyvind
Johannessen, Hege Holmo
Gleditsch, Jostein
Stavem, Knut
Steine, Kjetil
SPRUIT, Martijn A. 
Holst, Rene
Tavoly, Mazdak
Klok, Frederikus A.
Ghanima, Waleed
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: BMC
Source: Trials, 22 (1) (Art N° 22)
Abstract: BackgroundRecently, a large group of patients with persistent dyspnea, poor physical capacity, and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following pulmonary embolism (PE) has been identified and clustered under the name "post pulmonary embolism syndrome" (PPS). These patients seem good candidates for pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of the study is to explore whether a pulmonary rehabilitation program can improve physical capacity, dyspnea, and HRQoL in PPS patients.MethodsA two-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being performed at Ostfold Hospital and Akershus University Hospital in Norway. Patients with PPS are 1:1 randomized into an intervention or a control group. The intervention consists of a supervised, outpatient rehabilitation program twice weekly (1h) for 8weeks provided by experienced physiotherapists. The intervention involves individually adapted exercises based on existing pulmonary rehabilitation programs (relaxation, interval, and resistance training), and an educational session including topics such as normal anatomy and physiology of the respiratory and circulatory system, information on PE/PPS, breathing strategies, and benefits of exercise/physical activity. Patients randomized to the control group receive usual care without specific instructions to exercise.Participants in the intervention and control groups will be compared based on assessments conducted at baseline, 12weeks, and 36weeks after inclusion using the incremental shuttle walk test (primary outcome) and endurance shuttle walk test (exercise capacity), Sensewear activity monitor (daily physical activity), the modified Medical Research Council scale, the Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (dyspnea), and EQ-5D-5L and the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQoL).Recruitment of 190 patients is currently ongoing.DiscussionResults from this study may provide a currently untreated group of PPS patients with an effective treatment resulting in reduced symptoms of dyspnea, improved exercise capacity, and better HRQoL following PE.Trial registrationClinical Trials NCT03405480. Registered prospectively on September 2017.Protocol version 1 (from original protocol September 2017).The study protocol has been reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Clinical Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines (Additional file 1).
Notes: Haukeland-Parker, S (corresponding author), Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, PB 300, N-1714 Gralum, Norway.; Haukeland-Parker, S (corresponding author), Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Basic Med, Oslo Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway.
stacey.haukeland.parker@so-hf.no
Other: Haukeland-Parker, S (corresponding author), Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, PB 300, N-1714 Gralum, Norway ; Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Basic Med, Oslo Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway. stacey.haukeland.parker@so-hf.no
Keywords: Pulmonary embolism;Rrehabilitation;Dyspnea;Exercise capacity;Quality of life;Randomized controlled trial
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33815
e-ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04940-9
ISI #: WOS:000610158500015
Rights: The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1186_s13063-020-04940-9.pdfPublished version853.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Page view(s)

22
checked on Jun 3, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 3, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.