Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/33967
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBianchini, Juana-
dc.contributor.authorSimons, Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorFAES, Christel-
dc.contributor.authorNicolas, Gaelle-
dc.contributor.authorVilain, Aline-
dc.contributor.authorHendrickx, Guy-
dc.contributor.authorSaegerman, Claude-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-21T13:40:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-21T13:40:13Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2021-03-16T12:23:35Z-
dc.identifier.citationTransboundary and Emerging Diseases, 69(2), p. 501-515-
dc.identifier.issn1865-1674-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/33967-
dc.description.abstractAnimal health information systems or risk analysis tools are indispensable not only for animal health surveillance, but also to observe the evolution and risk of disease incursion into a disease-free area. Given the various information that can be derived from these both animal information systems and risk analysis tools, different international and national organizations have customized or created their own systems/tools to provide specific information for use by the respective countries. Moreover, with the increase of technology and data storage, they have become more accessible and widely used by professionals in animal and human health sciences. This study aimed to establish user's preferences, needs and constraints in respect of these animal information systems and risk analysis tools. An online survey was conducted and answered by 213 respondents from 132 countries. The respondents were animal health or public health professionals in different employment sectors (mostly in government, research and university institutions) and various fields of competency (highest for animal and public health). The majority of respondents used the animal health information systems frequently and on a weekly basis, with prevention measures of diseases being regarded as the most useful information. Descriptive epidemiology was more used/needed than analytical epidemiology. Risk analysis was performed by the majority of the respondents (70%), using a qualitative approach more than a quantitative or semi-qualitative. The primary objectives were to produce risk assessment and preparedness in areas involving origin and spread of animal diseases. The features most sought after in risk analysis tools were pathways of introduction and spread assessment. The level of satisfaction was higher for the platform which is most used by the respondents. Overall, these results could be taken into consideration when improving an already available platform, or when creating a new efficient tool.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal Public Service of Health, Food Chain and Environment, Grant/Award Number: MORISKIN research project RT18/2-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWILEY-
dc.rights2021 Wiley- VCH GmbH-
dc.subject.otheranimal and public health-
dc.subject.otheranimal health systems-
dc.subject.otherlikert scale-
dc.subject.otheronline cross&#8208-
dc.subject.othersectional survey-
dc.subject.otherrisk analysis-
dc.titleAssessing the use of animal health platforms: User’s needs, preferences and constraints-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage515-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage501-
dc.identifier.volume69-
local.format.pages15-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesSaegerman, C (corresponding author), Univ Liege, Fundamental & Appl Res Animals & Hlth FARAH Ctr, Fac Vet Med, UREAR ULiege, Quartier Valley 2,Ave Cureghem 7 A,B42, B-4000 Liege, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesclaude.saegerman@uliege.be-
dc.description.otherSaegerman, C (corresponding author), Univ Liege, Fundamental & Appl Res Animals & Hlth FARAH Ctr, Fac Vet Med, UREAR ULiege, Quartier Valley 2,Ave Cureghem 7 A,B42, B-4000 Liege, Belgium. claude.saegerman@uliege.be-
local.publisher.place111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/tbed.14008-
dc.identifier.isi000619941900001-
dc.contributor.orcidSaegerman, Claude/0000-0001-9087-7436-
dc.identifier.eissn1865-1682-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.description.affiliation[Bianchini, Juana; Saegerman, Claude] Univ Liege, Fac Vet Med, Res Unit Epidemiol & Risk Anal Appl Vet Sci UREA, Liege, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Simons, Xavier; Vilain, Aline] Sciensano, Vet Epidemiol, Brussels, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Faes, Christel] Hasselt Univ, Data Sci Inst, I BioStat, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Nicolas, Gaelle; Hendrickx, Guy] Avia GIS, Zoersel, Belgium.-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.contributorBianchini, Juana-
item.contributorSimons, Xavier-
item.contributorFAES, Christel-
item.contributorNicolas, Gaelle-
item.contributorVilain, Aline-
item.contributorHendrickx, Guy-
item.contributorSaegerman, Claude-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2022-
item.fullcitationBianchini, Juana; Simons, Xavier; FAES, Christel; Nicolas, Gaelle; Vilain, Aline; Hendrickx, Guy & Saegerman, Claude (2022) Assessing the use of animal health platforms: User’s needs, preferences and constraints. In: Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 69(2), p. 501-515.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
crisitem.journal.issn1865-1674-
crisitem.journal.eissn1865-1682-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Transbounding Emerging Dis - 2021 - Bianchini - Assessing the use of animal health platforms User s needs preferences and.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on May 1, 2024

Page view(s)

28
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.