Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34109
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBELMANS, Niels-
dc.contributor.authorOenning, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorSalmon, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorBaselet, Bjorn-
dc.contributor.authorTabury, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorLucas, Stéphane-
dc.contributor.authorLAMBRICHTS, Ivo-
dc.contributor.authorMOREELS, Marjan-
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Reinhilde-
dc.contributor.authorBaatout, Sarah-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T14:16:32Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-27T14:16:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-05-21T08:42:53Z-
dc.identifier.citationDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 50 (Art N° 20210153)-
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/34109-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR). Methods: Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiolog-ical effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobio-logical outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields. Results: There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dento-maxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children. Conclusions In the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding This work was supported by the European Atomic Energy Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2011 under grant agreement No. 604984 (OPERRA: Open Project for the European Radiation Research Area) and by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) under grant agreement No. G0A09.18N (TREASURE: Follow up of radiation dose and radiobiological effects after dental exposure to radiation). N. Belmans is supported by a doctoral SCK CEN grant. Acknowledgments The DIMITRA Research Group that contributed to this paper consists of N. Belmans, M. Moreels, S. Baatout, B. Salmon, A.C. Oenning, C. Chaussain, C. Lefevre, M. Hedesiu, P. Virag, M. Baciut, M. Marcu, O. Almasan, R. Roman, A. Porumb, C. Dinu, H. RotaruC. Ratiu, O. Lucaciu, B. Crisan, S. Bran, G. Baciut, R. Jacobs, H. Bosmans, R. Bogaerts, C. Politis, A. Stratis, R. Pauwels, K. de F. Vasconcelos, L. Nicolielo, G. Zhang, E. Tijskens, M. Vranckx, A. Ockerman, C. Morena, E. Embrechts. B. Baselet and K. Tabury helped with preparation of the manuscript. This work was supported by the European Atomic Energy Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2011 under grant agreement No. 60,4984 (OPERRA: Open Project for the European Radiation Research Area) and by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) under grant agreement No. G0A09.18N (TREASURE: Follow up of radiation dose and radiobiological effects after dental exposure to radiation). N. Belmans is supported by a doctoral SCK CEN grant.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBRITISH INST RADIOLOGY-
dc.rights2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.-
dc.subject.otherDentomaxillofacial imaging Radiation risk-
dc.subject.otherGenotoxicity-
dc.subject.otherCytotoxicity-
dc.titleRadiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.volume50-
local.format.pages14-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place48-50 ST JOHN ST, LONDON, ENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedReview-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr20210153-
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20210153-
dc.identifier.pmid33989056-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000687829700012-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.validationecoom 2022-
item.contributorBELMANS, Niels-
item.contributorOenning, Anne-
item.contributorSalmon, Benjamin-
item.contributorBaselet, Bjorn-
item.contributorTabury, Kevin-
item.contributorLucas, Stéphane-
item.contributorLAMBRICHTS, Ivo-
item.contributorMOREELS, Marjan-
item.contributorJacobs, Reinhilde-
item.contributorBaatout, Sarah-
item.fullcitationBELMANS, Niels; Oenning, Anne; Salmon, Benjamin; Baselet, Bjorn; Tabury, Kevin; Lucas, Stéphane; LAMBRICHTS, Ivo; MOREELS, Marjan; Jacobs, Reinhilde & Baatout, Sarah (2021) Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?. In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 50 (Art N° 20210153).-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0250-832X-
crisitem.journal.eissn1476-542X-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
dmfr.20210153.pdfPublished version389.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.