Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34129
Title: | “Can Do” Versus “Do Do” in Patients with Asthma at First Referral to a Pulmonologist | Authors: | Janssen, Steffi M. J. SPRUIT, Martijn A. Antons, Jeanine C. Djamin, Remco S. Abbink, Jannie J. van Helvoort, Hanneke A. C. van 't Hul, Alex J. |
Issue Date: | 2021 | Publisher: | ELSEVIER | Source: | Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 9 (3), p. 1278 -1284 | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy is key in asthma control, including preventing lung function decline, in primary care. However, patients' physical functioning (eg, physical capacity [PC] [=can do] and physical activity [PA] [=do do]) correlates poorly with lung function. Therefore, a better insight into the physical function of patients with asthma is needed, using the "can do, do do" concept. OBJECTIVE: To explore the "can do, do do" concept in adult patients with asthma at referral for the first time to an outpatient consultation of a pulmonologist. METHODS: PC was measured using the six-minute walk test and PA by using an accelerometer. Patients were classified into quadrants: low PC (6-minute walking distance <70% predicted), low PA (<7000 steps/d, "'can't do, don't do"); preserved PC, low PA ("can do, don't do"); low PC, preserved PA ("'can't do, do do"); or preserved PC, preserved PA ("can do, do do"). RESULTS: A total of 479 patients with asthma had a median (interquartile range) 6-minute walking distance of 74% (66%82%) predicted, and walked 6829 (4593-9075) steps/d. Only 29% were classified as "can do, do do," whereas 30% were classified as "can't do, don't do." The Asthma Control Questionnaire and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were worst in the "can't do" groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low PC and/or PA was found in most patients with asthma at the index referral to a pulmonologist. An impaired PC is accompanied by a significantly reduced asthma control and disease-specific quality of life. This justifies further studies on safety and efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions, such as physiotherapy. (C) 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology | Notes: | van 't Hul, AJ (corresponding author), Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pulm Dis, Med Ctr, Postbus 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands. Alex.vantHul@radboudumc.nl |
Other: | van 't Hul, AJ (corresponding author), Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pulm Dis, Med Ctr, Postbus 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands. Alex.vantHul@radboudumc.nl | Keywords: | Asthma;Physical activity;Physical capacity;Asthma control;Quality of life | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34129 | ISSN: | 2213-2198 | e-ISSN: | 2213-2201 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.049 | ISI #: | WOS:000632634600025 | Rights: | 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | ecoom 2022 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s20-S2213219820310990-main.pdf | Published version | 382.78 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.