Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34166
Title: Workplace influenza vaccination to reduce employee absenteeism: An economic analysis from the employers’ perspective
Authors: Verelst, Frederik
Beutels, Philippe
HENS, Niel 
WILLEM, Lander 
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Source: VACCINE, 39 (14) , p. 2005 -2015
Abstract: Background: Each year, up to 10% of unvaccinated adults contracts seasonal influenza, with half of this proportion developing symptoms. As a result, employers experience significant economic losses in terms of employee absenteeism. Influenza vaccines can be instrumental in reducing this burden. Workplace vaccination is expected to reduce employee absenteeism more than linearly as a result of positive externalities. It remains unclear whether workplace influenza vaccination yields a positive return on investment. Methods: We simulated the spread of influenza in the seasons 2011-12 up to 2017-18 in Belgium by means of a compartmental transmission model. We accounted for age-specific social contact patterns and included reduced contact behavior when symptomatically infected. We simulated the impact of employer-funded influenza vaccination at the workplace and performed a cost-benefit analysis to assess the employers' return on workplace vaccination. Furthermore, we look into the cost-benefit of rewarding vaccinated employees by offering an additional day off. Results: Workplace vaccination reduced the burden of influenza both on the workplace and in the population at large. Compared to the current vaccine coverage - 21% in the population at large - an employee vaccine coverage of 90% could avert an additional 355 000 cases, of which about 150 000 in the employed population and 205 000 in the unemployed population. While seasonal influenza vaccination has been cost-saving on average at about (SIC)10 per vaccinated employee, the cost-benefit analysis was prone to between-season variability. Conclusions: Vaccinated employees can serve as a barrier to limit the spread of influenza in the population, reducing the attack rate by 78% at an employee coverage of 90%. While workplace vaccination is relatively inexpensive (due to economies of scale) and convenient, the return on investment is volatile. Government subsidies can be pivotal to encourage employers to provide vaccination at the workplace with positive externalities to society as a whole. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes: Verelst, F (corresponding author), Univ Antwerp, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Modelling Infect Dis, Vaccine & Infect Dis Inst, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
frederik.verelst@uantwerp.be
Other: Verelst, F (corresponding author), Univ Antwerp, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Modelling Infect Dis, Vaccine & Infect Dis Inst, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. frederik.verelst@uantwerp.be
Keywords: Vaccination;Workplace;Influenza;Cost-benefit analysis;Absenteeism;Employee
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34166
ISSN: 0264-410X
e-ISSN: 1873-2518
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.020
ISI #: WOS:000632984100018
Rights: 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s20-S0264410X21001687-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version851.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

22
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.