Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34226
Title: Periodized versus classic exercise therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial
Authors: KEYTSMAN, Charly 
VAN NOTEN, Pieter 
VERBOVEN, Kenneth 
VAN ASCH, Paul 
OP 'T EIJNDE, Bert 
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Source: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 49 , (Art N° 102782)
Abstract: Background: Periodizing exercise interventions in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) shows good high intensity exercise training adherence. Whether this approach induces comparable training adaptations with respect to exercise capacity, body composition and muscle strength compared to conventional, linear progressive training programs however is not known. Methods: Thirty-one persons with MS (all phenotypes, mean EDSS 2.3?1.3) were randomized into a twelve-week periodized (MSPER, n=17) or a classic endurance (MSCLA, n=14) training program. At baseline (PRE), exercise capacity (maximal exercise test, VO2max), body composition (DEXA) and muscle strength (Biodex?) were assessed. Classic, moderate intensity endurance training (60-80% HRmax, 5 training sessions/2w, 60min/session) was performed on a stationary bicycle. Periodized exercise included 4 recurrent 3-week cycles of alternated endurance training (week 1: endurance training as described above), high intense exercise (week 2: 3 sessions/w, 3 ? 20s all-out sprints, 10min/session) and recovery weeks (week 3: one sprint session as described above). POST measurements were performed similar to baseline. Total exercise volume of both programs was expressed as total peak-effort training minutes. Results: For MSCLA, total exercise volume included 1728 total peak-effort training minutes, whereas MSPER included only 736. Despite this substantially reduced training volume, twelve weeks of periodized training significantly (p<0.05) improved VO2max (+14%, p=0.001), workload (+20%) and time until exhaustion (+25%). Classic training significantly (p<0.05) improved workload (+10%) and time until exhaustion (+17%), but not VO2max (+5%, p=0.131). Pre-post improvements for VO2max were significantly higher in MSPER compared to MSCLA (p=0.046). Conclusion: These data show that despite substantially lower training time (57% less peak-effort training minutes), 12 weeks of periodized exercise training in persons with MS seems to induce larger improvements in parameters of exercise capacity compared to classic endurance training. We therefore recommend to further investigate the effect of training periodization on various functional rehabilitation measures in MS.
Notes: Keytsman, C (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, REVAL Rehabil Ctr, Biomed Res Inst BIOMED, Agoralaan Bldg A, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
charly.keytsman@uhasselt.be
Other: Keytsman, C (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, REVAL Rehabil Ctr, Biomed Res Inst BIOMED, Agoralaan Bldg A, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. charly.keytsman@uhasselt.be
Keywords: Multiple sclerosis;Rehabilitation;High intensity interval training;Periodisation
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34226
ISSN: 2211-0348
e-ISSN: 2211-0356
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102782
ISI #: WOS:000641392000007
Rights: © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s20-S2211034821000481-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Page view(s)

48
checked on Aug 30, 2022

Download(s)

14
checked on Aug 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.