Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34414
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSTESSEL, Bjorn-
dc.contributor.authorHendrickx, Maarten-
dc.contributor.authorPelckmans, Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorDe Wachter, Gerrit-
dc.contributor.authorAPPELTANS, Bart-
dc.contributor.authorBraeken, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorHerbots, Jeroen-
dc.contributor.authorJoosten, Elbert-
dc.contributor.authorVan de Velde, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorBuhre, Wolfgang F F A-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T12:29:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-06T12:29:02Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-06-30T12:20:37Z-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One, 16 (1) (Art N° e0245774)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/34414-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to study one-month recovery profile and to identify predictors of Quality of Recovery (QOR) after painful day surgery and investigate the influence of pain therapy on QOR.-
dc.description.abstractBackground/ObjectivesThis study aimed to study one-month recovery profile and to identify predictors of Quality of Recovery (QOR) after painful day surgery and investigate the influence of pain therapy on QOR.Methods/DesignThis is a secondary analysis of a single-centre, randomised controlled trial of 200 patients undergoing ambulatory haemorrhoid surgery, arthroscopic shoulder or knee surgery, or inguinal hernia repair between January 2016 and March 2017. Primary endpoints were one-month recovery profile and prevalence of poor/good QOR measured by the Functional Recovery Index (FRI), the Global Surgical Recovery index and the EuroQol questionnaire at postoperative day (POD) 1 to 4, 7, 14 and 28. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of QOR at POD 7, 14, and 28. Differences in QOR between pain treatment groups were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsFour weeks after haemorrhoid surgery, inguinal hernia repair, arthroscopic knee and arthroscopic shoulder surgery, good QOR was present in 71%, 76%, 57% and 24% respectively. Poor QOR was present in 5%, 0%, 7% and 29%, respectively. At POD 7 and POD 28, predictors for poor/intermediate QOR were type of surgery and a high postoperative pain level at POD 4. Male gender was another predictor at POD 7. Female gender and having a paid job were also predictors at POD 28. Type of surgery and long term fear of surgery were predictors at POD 14. No significant differences in total FRI scores were found between the two different pain treatment groups.ConclusionsThe present study shows a procedure-specific variation in recovery profile in the 4-week period after painful day surgery. The best predictors for short-term (POD 7) and long-term (POD 28) poor/intermediate QOR were a high postoperative pain level at POD 4 and type of surgery. Different pain treatment regimens did not result in differences in recovery profile.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was be funded solely by departmental funding. Trial Sponsor JESSA Hospital D. Ramaekers, Medical Director JESSA Hospital Jessa Hospital – Hasselt, Virga-Jesse Campus Stadsomvaart 11 3500 Hasselt, Belgium Phone +32 11308111 dirk.ramaekers@jessazh.be The sponsor had no role in the design of this study and will not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE-
dc.rights2021 Stessel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.-
dc.subject.otherAdult-
dc.subject.otherAged-
dc.subject.otherAmbulatory Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.otherElective Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.otherFemale-
dc.subject.otherHumans-
dc.subject.otherMale-
dc.subject.otherMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.otherPain, Postoperative-
dc.subject.otherPatient Satisfaction-
dc.subject.otherPatient Reported Outcome Measures-
dc.titleOne-month recovery profile and prevalence and predictors of quality of recovery after painful day case surgery: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.volume16-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnre0245774-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0245774-
dc.identifier.pmid33497408-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000613707100018-
local.provider.typePubMed-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationSTESSEL, Bjorn; Hendrickx, Maarten; Pelckmans, Caroline; De Wachter, Gerrit; APPELTANS, Bart; Braeken, Geert; Herbots, Jeroen; Joosten, Elbert; Van de Velde, Marc & Buhre, Wolfgang F F A (2021) One-month recovery profile and prevalence and predictors of quality of recovery after painful day case surgery: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. In: PLoS One, 16 (1) (Art N° e0245774).-
item.validationecoom 2023-
item.contributorSTESSEL, Bjorn-
item.contributorHendrickx, Maarten-
item.contributorPelckmans, Caroline-
item.contributorDe Wachter, Gerrit-
item.contributorAPPELTANS, Bart-
item.contributorBraeken, Geert-
item.contributorHerbots, Jeroen-
item.contributorJoosten, Elbert-
item.contributorVan de Velde, Marc-
item.contributorBuhre, Wolfgang F F A-
crisitem.journal.issn1932-6203-
crisitem.journal.eissn1932-6203-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pone.0245774.pdfPublished version1.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.