Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34525
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLAING, Brittany-
dc.contributor.authorDE KEYZER, Jozefien-
dc.contributor.authorSeveno, David-
dc.contributor.authorVAN BAEL, Albert-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T14:24:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-23T14:24:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2021-07-12T12:56:36Z-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of applied polymer science (Print), 137 (9) (Art N° 48414)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/34525-
dc.description.abstractTwo-component (2K) injection-molded products combining ethylene-propylene-diene monomer (EPDM) with polar or nonpolar thermoplastics require strong interfacial bonding. To optimize the adhesion, co-agents trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (TMPT) and triallyl cyanurate (TAC) are compared and concentrations were varied between 0 and 12 parts per hundred rubber (phr). Changes in material compatibility were characterized by contact angle measurements at high temperature, the adhesion was evaluated by tensile testing, and physicomechanical properties of the EPDM bulk were analyzed. Results show that with polypropylene, the adhesion increases to an optimum (3 phr TAC or 6 phr TMPT) independent of the co-agent type, while for polyethylene only TAC (1.5 phr) effectively boosts adhesion. It is surmised that these optimal concentrations promote crosslinking reactions at the interface. For polycarbonate and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, increasing TAC concentration causes higher adhesion due to improved compatibility. Furthermore, physicomechanical bulk properties change significantly with co-agent concentrations, making the optimal curing composition application dependent. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 48414.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.othercrosslinking-
dc.subject.othermolding-
dc.subject.otherrubber-
dc.subject.othersurfaces and interface-
dc.subject.otherthermoplastics-
dc.titleEffect of co‐agents on adhesion between peroxide cured ethylene–propylene–diene monomer and thermoplastics in two‐component injection molding-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.volume137-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr48414-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/app.48414-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000482327400001-
dc.contributor.orcidDe Keyzer, Jozefien/0000-0002-2056-0174; Van Bael,-
dc.contributor.orcidAlbert/0000-0002-8661-0461; Seveno, David/0000-0002-1726-7890; Laing,-
dc.contributor.orcidBrittany/0000-0001-7881-2920-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.contributorLAING, Brittany-
item.contributorDE KEYZER, Jozefien-
item.contributorSeveno, David-
item.contributorVAN BAEL, Albert-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationLAING, Brittany; DE KEYZER, Jozefien; Seveno, David & VAN BAEL, Albert (2020) Effect of co‐agents on adhesion between peroxide cured ethylene–propylene–diene monomer and thermoplastics in two‐component injection molding. In: Journal of applied polymer science (Print), 137 (9) (Art N° 48414).-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0021-8995-
crisitem.journal.eissn1097-4628-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
app.48414.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Effect of co-agents on adhesion between peroxide cured EPDM and thermoplastics in two-component injection molding_ post print.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

18
checked on Jun 9, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 9, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.