Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34592
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVan de Moortel, Wim-
dc.contributor.authorKamali, Mohammadreza-
dc.contributor.authorSNIEGOWSKI, Kristel-
dc.contributor.authorBRAEKEN, Leen-
dc.contributor.authorDegrève, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorLuyten, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorDEWIL, Raf-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-30T12:56:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-30T12:56:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.date.submitted2021-07-08T13:29:36Z-
dc.identifier.citationWater (Basel), 12 (6) (Art N° 1672)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/34592-
dc.description.abstractPhotocatalysis is of high interest for the treatment of wastewater containing non-biodegradable organic components. In this work, the photocatalytic degradation of phenol by TiO(2)photocatalysis was assessed, the influence of ultrasound (US) treatment was evaluated, and the mechanisms behind it were elucidated. It was shown that the TiO(2)concentration (in suspension) has a large influence on the degradation kinetics. At high TiO(2)concentrations, a reduced efficiency was observed due to the shielding of the UV light by TiO(2)particles. US treatment effectively increased phenol degradation by improving the mass transfer while it was shown by the experimental data that particle deagglomeration did not play a significant role. The degradation mainly occurred through indirect phenol oxidation by hydroxyl (OH*) radicals, which were formed in situ at the surface of the photocatalyst. Finally, based on the partial least squares (PLS) methodology, a mathematical model was developed, representing phenol degradation as a function of the selected process conditions.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherphenol-
dc.subject.otheradvanced oxidation processes-
dc.subject.otherultrasound-
dc.subject.otherphotocatalysis-
dc.subject.otherdeagglomeration-
dc.titleHow Photocatalyst Dosage and Ultrasound Application Influence the Photocatalytic Degradation Rate of Phenol in Water: Elucidating the Mechanisms Behind-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.volume12-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr1672-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w12061672-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000550700400001-
dc.contributor.orcidBraeken, Leen/0000-0003-2180-8570; Dewil, Raf/0000-0003-4717-5484;-
dc.contributor.orcidDewil, Raf/0000-0003-4717-5484; Kamali, Mohammadreza/0000-0002-1591-9605-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.contributorVan de Moortel, Wim-
item.contributorKamali, Mohammadreza-
item.contributorSNIEGOWSKI, Kristel-
item.contributorBRAEKEN, Leen-
item.contributorDegrève, Jan-
item.contributorLuyten, Jan-
item.contributorDEWIL, Raf-
item.fullcitationVan de Moortel, Wim; Kamali, Mohammadreza; SNIEGOWSKI, Kristel; BRAEKEN, Leen; Degrève, Jan; Luyten, Jan & DEWIL, Raf (2020) How Photocatalyst Dosage and Ultrasound Application Influence the Photocatalytic Degradation Rate of Phenol in Water: Elucidating the Mechanisms Behind. In: Water (Basel), 12 (6) (Art N° 1672).-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.eissn2073-4441-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
water-12-01672-v2.pdfPublished version2.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

24
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

10
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.