Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34635
Title: Impact of renal function on clinical outcomes after PCI in ACS and stable CAD patients treated with ticagrelor: a prespecified analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS randomized clinical trial
Authors: Tomaniak, Mariusz
Chichareon, Ply
Klimczak-Tomaniak, Dominika
Takahashi, Kuniaki
Kogame, Norihiro
Modolo, Rodrigo
Wang, Rutao
Ono, Masafumi
Hara, Hironori
Gao, Chao
Kawashima, Hideyuki
Rademaker-Havinga, Tessa
Garg, Scot
Curzen, Nick
Haude, Michael
Kochman, Janusz
Gori, Tommaso
Montalescot, Gilles
Angiolillo, Dominick J.
Capodanno, Davide
Storey, Robert F.
Hamm, Christian
VRANCKX, Pascal 
Valgimigli, Marco
Windecker, Stephan
Onuma, Yoshinobu
Serruys, Patrick W.
Anderson, Richard
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: 
Source: Clinical research in cardiology (Print), 109 (7) , p. 930 -943
Abstract: Background Impaired renal function (IRF) is associated with increased risks of both ischemic and bleeding events. Ticagrelor has been shown to provide greater absolute reduction in ischemic risk following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in those with versus without IRF. Methods A pre-specified sub-analysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial (n = 15,991) comparing the experimental strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy (after 1-month ticagrelor and aspirin dual anti-platelet therapy [DAPT]) with 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ACS and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients stratified according to IRF (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Results At 2 years, patients with IRF (n = 2171) had a higher rate of the primary endpoint (all-cause mortality or centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI](hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.98,p(adj) = 0.001), all-cause death, site-reported MI, all revascularization and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding, compared with patients without IRF. Among patients with IRF, there were similar rates of the primary endpoint (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.11,p = 0.192,p(int) = 0.680) and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.71-1.71,p = 0.656,p(int) = 0.506) in the experimental versus the reference group. No significant interactions were seen between IRF and treatment effect for any of the secondary outcome variables. Among ACS patients with IRF, there were no between-group differences in the rates of the primary endpoint or BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding; however, the rates of the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) of all-cause death, any stroke, MI, or revascularization (p(int) = 0.028) and net adverse clinical events (POCE and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding) (p(int) = 0.045), were lower in the experimental versus the reference group. No treatment effects were found in stable CAD patients categorized according to presence of IRF. Conclusions IRF negatively impacted long-term prognosis after PCI. There were no differential treatment effects found with regard to all-cause death or new Q-wave MI after PCI in patients with IRF treated with ticagrelor monotherapy. Graphic abstract
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34635
ISSN: 1861-0684
e-ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-019-01586-9
ISI #: WOS:000541828900014
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tomaniak2020_Article_ImpactOfRenalFunctionOnClinica.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

26
checked on Jul 20, 2022

Download(s)

2
checked on Jul 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.