Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34686
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorROUSSEAU, Axel-Jan-
dc.contributor.authorBECKER, Thijs-
dc.contributor.authorBertels, Jeroen-
dc.contributor.authorBlaschko, Matthew B.-
dc.contributor.authorVALKENBORG, Dirk-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T15:32:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-19T15:32:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-08-12T10:53:27Z-
dc.identifier.citation2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), p. 1052 -1056-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-6654-1246-9-
dc.identifier.issn1945-7928-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/34686-
dc.description.abstractNeural networks for automated image segmentation are typically trained to achieve maximum accuracy, while less attention has been given to the calibration of their confidence scores. However, well-calibrated confidence scores provide valuable information towards the user. We investigate several post hoc calibration methods that are straightforward to implement, some of which are novel. They are compared to Monte Carlo (MC) dropout and are applied to neural networks trained with cross-entropy (CE) and soft Dice (SD) losses on BraTS 2018 and ISLES 2018. Surprisingly, models trained on SD loss are not necessarily less calibrated than those trained on CE loss. In all cases, at least one post hoc method improves the calibration. There is limited consistency across the results, so we can't conclude on one method being superior. In all cases, post hoc calibration is competitive with MC dropout. Although average calibration improves compared to the base model, subject-level variance of the calibration remains similar.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherIEEE-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging-
dc.subject.otheruncertainty estimation-
dc.subject.otherconfidence calibration-
dc.subject.otherdeep learning-
dc.subject.otherMedical image segmentation-
dc.titlePost Training Uncertainty Calibration Of Deep Networks For Medical Image Segmentation-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate13-16 April 2021-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceNice, France-
dc.identifier.epage1056-
dc.identifier.spage1052-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.place345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.type.programmeVSC-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9434131-
dc.identifier.isi000786144100220-
local.provider.typeCrossRef-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitle2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.contributorROUSSEAU, Axel-Jan-
item.contributorBECKER, Thijs-
item.contributorBertels, Jeroen-
item.contributorBlaschko, Matthew B.-
item.contributorVALKENBORG, Dirk-
item.fullcitationROUSSEAU, Axel-Jan; BECKER, Thijs; Bertels, Jeroen; Blaschko, Matthew B. & VALKENBORG, Dirk (2021) Post Training Uncertainty Calibration Of Deep Networks For Medical Image Segmentation. In: 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), p. 1052 -1056.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2023-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
POST_TRAINING_UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION_OF_DEEP_NETWORKS_FOR_MEDICAL_IMAGE_SEGMENTATION.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
4545_arXiv.pdfNon Peer-reviewed author version1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

68
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

14
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.