Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34785
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gontariuk, Marie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Krafft, Thomas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rehbock, Cassandra | - |
dc.contributor.author | Townend, David | - |
dc.contributor.author | VAN DER AUWERMEULEN, Loth | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pilot, Eva | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-02T13:10:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-02T13:10:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-08-23T13:20:37Z | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in public health, 9 (Art N° 698995) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34785 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The first wave of the coronavirus SARS-COV-2 pandemic has revealed a fragmented governance within the European Union (EU) to tackle public health emergencies. This qualitative study aims: 1) to understand the current EU position within the field of public health emergencies taking the case of the COVID-19 as an example by comparing and contrasting experiences from EU institutions and experts from various EU Member States at the beginning of the pandemic; and, 2) to identify and to formulate future EU pandemic strategies and actions based on experts' opinions. Methods: Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with public health experts from various European Member States and European Commission officials from May 2020 until August 2020. The transcripts were analyzed by Thematic Content Analysis (TCA), mainly a manifest content analysis. Results: This study demonstrated that the limited EU mandate in health hinders proper actions to prevent and tackle infectious disease outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed that this limitation significantly impacted the ECDC, as the Member States' competence did not allow the agency to have more capacity. The European Commission has fulfilled its role of coordinating and supporting the Member States by facilitating networks and information exchange. However, EU intra-and inter-communication need further improvement. Although diverse EU instruments and mechanisms were found valid, their implementation needed to be faster and more efficient. The results pointed out that underlying political challenges in EU decision-making regarding health emergencies hinder the aligned response. It was stated that the Member States were not prepared, and due to the restriction of their mandate, EU institutions could not enforce binding guidelines. Additionally, the study explored future EU pandemic strategies and actions. Both, EU institutions and national experts suggested similar and clear recommendations regarding the ECDC, the investment, and future harmonized preparedness tools. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | We would like to thank all participants for their time and engagement. While no external funding was used for this study, the authors would like to acknowledge the stimulating debates within and the academic support from the International Knowledge and Information Centre in Public Safety (IKIC). | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | FRONTIERS MEDIA SA | - |
dc.rights | 2021 Gontariuk, Krafft, Rehbock, Townend, Van der Auwermeulen and Pilot. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | - |
dc.subject.other | COVID-19 pandemic | - |
dc.subject.other | European public health | - |
dc.subject.other | health emergencies | - |
dc.subject.other | health policy | - |
dc.subject.other | European governance | - |
dc.subject.other | international health regulations | - |
dc.subject.other | public health emergencies of international concern | - |
dc.subject.other | joint procurement mechanism | - |
dc.title | The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
local.format.pages | 11 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.publisher.place | AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr | 698995 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.698995 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000693040500001 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2296-2565 | - |
local.provider.type | CrossRef | - |
local.uhasselt.uhpub | yes | - |
local.uhasselt.international | yes | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.contributor | Gontariuk, Marie | - |
item.contributor | Krafft, Thomas | - |
item.contributor | Rehbock, Cassandra | - |
item.contributor | Townend, David | - |
item.contributor | VAN DER AUWERMEULEN, Loth | - |
item.contributor | Pilot, Eva | - |
item.fullcitation | Gontariuk, Marie; Krafft, Thomas; Rehbock, Cassandra; Townend, David; VAN DER AUWERMEULEN, Loth & Pilot, Eva (2021) The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies. In: Frontiers in public health, 9 (Art N° 698995). | - |
item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2022 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 2296-2565 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frontiers_The European Union and Public Health Emergencies.pdf | Published version | 260.29 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.