Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34845
Title: Worldwide Clinical Practice of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Concomitant Aerosol Therapy in the Adult ICU Setting
Authors: Li, Jie
Tu, Meilien
Jing, Guoqiang
Fink, James B.
BURTIN, Chris 
de Andrade, Armele Dornelas
Gong, Lingyue
Ehrmann, Stephan
Yang, Lei
Xie, Lixin
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: DAEDALUS ENTERPRISES INC
Source: RESPIRATORY CARE, 66 (9) , p. 1416 -1424
Abstract: BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has been broadly used. However, no consensus has been achieved on the practical implementation of HFNC and how to provide aerosol delivery during HFNC therapy in adult patients. METHODS: An online anonymous questionnaire survey endorsed by 4 academic societies from America, Europe, mainland China, and Taiwan was administered from May to December 2019. Clinicians who had worked in adult ICUs for > 1 year and had used HFNC to treat patients within 30 days were included. RESULTS: A total of 2,279 participants clicked on the survey link, 1,358 respondents completed the HFNC section of the questionnaire, whereas 1,014 completed the whole survey. Postextubation hypoxemia and moderate hypoxemia were major indications for HFNC. The initial flow was mainly set at 40-50 L/min. Aerosol delivery via HFNC was used by 24% of the participants (248/1,014), 30% (74/248) of whom reported reducing flow during aerosol delivery. For the patients who required aerosol treatment during HFNC therapy, 40% of the participants (403/1,014) reported placing a nebulizer with a mask or mouthpiece while pursuing HFNC whereas 33% (331/1,014) discontinued HFNC to use conventional aerosol devices. A vibrating mesh nebulizer was the most commonly used nebulizer (40%) and was mainly placed at the inlet of the humidifier. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utilization of HFNC was variable, as were indications, flow settings, and criteria for adjustment. Many practices associated with concomitant aerosol therapy were not consistent with available evidence for optimal use. More efforts are warranted to close the knowledge gap.
Notes: Li, J (corresponding author), Rush Univ, Dept Cardiopulm Sci, Div Resp Care, 600 S Paulina St,Suite 765, Chicago, IL 60612 USA.; Xie, LX (corresponding author), Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, 28 Fuzing Rd Wukesong, Beijing, Peoples R China.
Jie_Li@rush.edu; xielx301@126.com
Keywords: High-flow nasal cannula; aerosol therapy; survey; hypoxemia; transnasal;pulmonary aerosol delivery
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/34845
ISSN: 0020-1324
e-ISSN: 1943-3654
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.08996
ISI #: WOS:000686562000007
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
respcare089961.full.pdfPublished version1.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Jul 26, 2024

Page view(s)

28
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

56
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.