Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/35495
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFoubert-
dc.contributor.authorHENDRICKS, Alicia-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T10:15:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-08T10:15:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-10-05T13:49:09Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/35495-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleGruba and Others v. Russia: the ECtHR repeats its Konstantin Markin v. Russia jurisprudence but (again) misses a child-oriented perspective-
dc.typeOther-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatO-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedWeb Content-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/10/01/gruba-and-others-v-russia-the-ecthr-repeats-its-konstantin-markin-v-russia-jurisprudence-but-again-misses-a-child-oriented-perspective/-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
item.fullcitationHENDRICKS, Alicia (2021) Gruba and Others v. Russia: the ECtHR repeats its Konstantin Markin v. Russia jurisprudence but (again) misses a child-oriented perspective.-
item.contributorHENDRICKS, Alicia-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.