Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/35495
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFoubert-
dc.contributor.authorHENDRICKS, Alicia-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T10:15:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-08T10:15:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-10-05T13:49:09Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/35495-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleGruba and Others v. Russia: the ECtHR repeats its Konstantin Markin v. Russia jurisprudence but (again) misses a child-oriented perspective-
dc.typeOther-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatO-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedWeb Content-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/10/01/gruba-and-others-v-russia-the-ecthr-repeats-its-konstantin-markin-v-russia-jurisprudence-but-again-misses-a-child-oriented-perspective/-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
item.fullcitationHENDRICKS, Alicia (2021) Gruba and Others v. Russia: the ECtHR repeats its Konstantin Markin v. Russia jurisprudence but (again) misses a child-oriented perspective.-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.contributorHENDRICKS, Alicia-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Sep 10, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.