Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/356
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorGOETGHEBEUR, Els-
dc.contributor.authorLipsitz, Stuart R.-
dc.contributor.authorKenward, Michael G.-
dc.date.accessioned2004-10-25T07:23:48Z-
dc.date.available2004-10-25T07:23:48Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationThe American Statistician, 53(2). p. 110-118-
dc.identifier.issn0003-1305-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/356-
dc.description.abstractThere have recently been substantial developments in the analysis of incomplete data. Modeling tools are now available for nonrandom missingness and these methods are finding their way into the broad statistical community. The computational and interpretational issues that surround such models are less well known. This article provides an exposition of several of these issues in a categorical data setting. It is argued that the use of contextual information can aid the modeler in discriminating among models that are indistinguishable purely on statistical grounds.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAMER STATISTICAL ASSOC-
dc.rights(c) 1999 American Statistical Association-
dc.subjectCategorical data-
dc.subjectMissing data-
dc.subjectLongitudinal data-
dc.subjectClustered data-
dc.subject.othercontingency tables; generalized linear models; longitudinal data; maximum likelihood estimation; missing values; nonrandom missingness-
dc.titleNon-Random Missingness in Categorical Data: Strengths and Limitations-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage118-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage110-
dc.identifier.volume53-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/2685728-
dc.identifier.isi000080223100006-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationMOLENBERGHS, Geert; GOETGHEBEUR, Els; Lipsitz, Stuart R. & Kenward, Michael G. (1999) Non-Random Missingness in Categorical Data: Strengths and Limitations. In: The American Statistician, 53(2). p. 110-118.-
item.validationecoom 2000-
item.contributorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
item.contributorGOETGHEBEUR, Els-
item.contributorLipsitz, Stuart R.-
item.contributorKenward, Michael G.-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
out (5).pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version709.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

46
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

66
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

42
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.