Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/35895
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSHAFIQUE, Ahmed-
dc.contributor.authorRangasamy, VS-
dc.contributor.authorVanhulsel, A-
dc.contributor.authorSAFARI, Momo-
dc.contributor.authorGross, S-
dc.contributor.authorADRIAENSENS, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorVAN BAEL, Marlies-
dc.contributor.authorHARDY, An-
dc.contributor.authorSallard, S-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T15:41:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-25T15:41:46Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-09-13T15:01:13Z-
dc.identifier.citationACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 13(24) , p. 28072 -28089-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/35895-
dc.description.abstractSulfur particles with a conductive polymer coating of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) "PEDOT" were prepared by dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma technology under atmospheric conditions (low temperature, ambient pressure). We report a solvent-free, low-cost, low-energy-consumption, safe, and low-risk process to make the material development and production compatible for sustainable technologies. Different coating protocols were developed to produce PEDOT-coated sulfur powders with electrical conductivity in the range of 10(-8)-10(-)(5) S/cm. The raw sulfur powder (used as the reference) and (low-, optimum-, high-) PEDOT-coated sulfur powders were used to assemble lithium-sulfur (Li-S) cells with a high sulfur loading of similar to 4.5 mg/cm(2). Long-term galvanostatic cycling at C/10 for 100 cycles showed that the capacity fade was mitigated by similar to 30% for the cells containing the optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur in comparison to the reference Li-S cells with raw sulfur. Rate capability, cyclic voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance analyzes confirmed the improved behavior of the PEDOT-coated sulfur as an active material for lithium-sulfur batteries. The Li-S cells containing optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur showed the highest reproducibility of their electrochemical properties. A wide variety of bulk and surface characterization methods including conductivity analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and NMR spectroscopy were used to explain the chemical features and the superior behavior of Li-S cells using the optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur material. Moreover, postmortem [SEM and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET)] analyzes of uncoated and coated samples allowed us to exclude any significant effect at the electrode scale even after 70 cycles.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors are grateful to Imerys Graphite & Carbon for providing the C-nergy Super-C65. The authors are thankful to Fulya Ulu, Andreas Paulus, Gunter Reekmans, Bert Verheyde, Anne-Marie De Wilde, Danny Havermans, Erwin Van Hoof, Myrjam Mertens, and Raymond Kemps for their help and support in the laboratory, the characterization of the samples, and the analysis of the data. Dr. Stefano Diodati is gratefully acknowledged for support in the elaboration of XPS data. NMR work was supported by Hasselt University and the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen; Hercules project AUHL/15/2-GOH3816N).-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC-
dc.rights2021 American Chemical Society-
dc.subject.otherlithium-sulfur-
dc.subject.otherbattery-
dc.subject.othersurface coating-
dc.subject.otherplasma-
dc.subject.otherdielectric barrier discharge-
dc.subject.otheraging-
dc.titleDielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma Coating of Sulfur for Mitigation of Capacity Fade in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage28089-
dc.identifier.issue24-
dc.identifier.spage28072-
dc.identifier.volume13-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acsami.1c04069-
dc.identifier.pmid34100584-
dc.identifier.isi000667982100032-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.contributorSHAFIQUE, Ahmed-
item.contributorRangasamy, VS-
item.contributorVanhulsel, A-
item.contributorSAFARI, Momo-
item.contributorGross, S-
item.contributorADRIAENSENS, Peter-
item.contributorVAN BAEL, Marlies-
item.contributorHARDY, An-
item.contributorSallard, S-
item.fullcitationSHAFIQUE, Ahmed; Rangasamy, VS; Vanhulsel, A; SAFARI, Momo; Gross, S; ADRIAENSENS, Peter; VAN BAEL, Marlies; HARDY, An & Sallard, S (2021) Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma Coating of Sulfur for Mitigation of Capacity Fade in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. In: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 13(24) , p. 28072 -28089.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2022-
crisitem.journal.issn1944-8244-
crisitem.journal.eissn1944-8252-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma Coating of Sulfur for Mitigation of Capacity Fade in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Template for Electronic Submission to ACS Journals.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

44
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

24
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.