Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/35941
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMOKAS, Ilias-
dc.contributor.authorLIZIN, Sebastien-
dc.contributor.authorBRIJS, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorWITTERS, Nele-
dc.contributor.authorMALINA, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T17:00:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-29T17:00:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.date.submitted2021-10-28T07:50:28Z-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 109 (Art N°102509)-
dc.identifier.issn0095-0696-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/35941-
dc.description.abstractStated preference methods such as discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are used to elicit respondents' preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental goods or services whose value cannot be observed in actual markets. However, DCEs may deliver biased estimates because of respondents' unfamiliarity with the hypothetical scenarios to be valued. There is evidence that visualization techniques can enhance respondents' cognitive ability and improve the evaluation and interpretation of complex information. We leverage recent technological advances to create an immersive virtual reality environment delivered to respondents via a head-mounted display in order to conduct a split split-sample experiment on the value of urban greenery (i.e., trees, bio-retention planters) using three different presentation formats (text only; video; virtual reality). We find that (i) respondent certainty can be increased by employing more immersive visualization techniques such as virtual reality, and that (ii) the presentation format has a significant impact on WTP estimates for different types of urban green and can change respondents' rank order for the urban green options considered in the study.-
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Foundation Flanders (FWO)FWO [12G5418N, 12B2917N]-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE-
dc.rights2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license-
dc.subject.otherDiscrete choice experiment-
dc.subject.otherGreen infrastructure-
dc.subject.otherHypothetical bias-
dc.subject.otherScale parameter-
dc.subject.otherScale heterogeneity-
dc.subject.otherVirtual reality-
dc.titleCan immersive virtual reality increase respondents’ certainty in discrete choice experiments? A comparison with traditional presentation formats-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.volume109-
local.format.pages17-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesMokas, I (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.-
dc.description.notesilias.mokas@uhasselt.be; sebastien.lizin@uhasselt.be;-
dc.description.notestom.brijs@uhasselt.be; nele.witters@uhasselt.be;-
dc.description.notesrobert.malina@uhasselt.be-
local.publisher.place525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr102509-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102509-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000707160300020-
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0449-
local.provider.typewosris-
local.description.affiliation[Mokas, Ilias; Lizin, Sebastien; Witters, Nele; Malina, Robert] Hasselt Univ, Res Grp Environm Econ, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Brijs, Tom] Hasselt Univ, Transportat Res Inst IMOB, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.description.affiliation[Malina, Robert] MIT, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Lab Aviat & Environm, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.-
local.uhasselt.internationalyes-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorMOKAS, Ilias-
item.contributorLIZIN, Sebastien-
item.contributorBRIJS, Tom-
item.contributorWITTERS, Nele-
item.contributorMALINA, Robert-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationMOKAS, Ilias; LIZIN, Sebastien; BRIJS, Tom; WITTERS, Nele & MALINA, Robert (2021) Can immersive virtual reality increase respondents’ certainty in discrete choice experiments? A comparison with traditional presentation formats. In: JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 109 (Art N°102509).-
item.validationecoom 2022-
crisitem.journal.issn0095-0696-
crisitem.journal.eissn1096-0449-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0095069621000784-main.pdfPublished version3.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Apr 15, 2024

Page view(s)

52
checked on Jun 1, 2022

Download(s)

36
checked on Jun 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.