Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/36098
Title: A community approach of pathogens and their arthropod vectors (ticks and fleas) in dogs of African Sub-Sahara
Authors: HEYLEN, Dieter 
Day, Michael
Schunack, Bettina
Fourie, Josephus
Labuschange, Michel
Johnson, Sherry
Githigia, Samuel Maina
Akande, Foluke Adedayo
Nzalawahe, Jahashi Saidi
Tayebwa, Dickson Stuart
Aschenborn, Ortwin
Marcondes, Mary
Madder, Maxime
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: BMC
Source: Parasites & vectors, 14 (1) (Art N° 576)
Abstract: Background: Arthropod-borne pathogens and their vectors are present throughout Africa. They have been well-studied in livestock of sub-Saharan Africa, but poorly in companion animals. Given the socio-economic importance of companion animals, the African Small Companion Animal Network (AFSCAN), as part of the WSAVA Foundation, initiated a standardized multi-country surveillance study. Methods: Macro-geographic variation in ectoparasite (ticks and fleas) and pathogen communities in dogs was assessed through molecular screening of approximately 100 infested dogs in each of six countries (Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda and Namibia), both in rural and urban settings. The most important intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors within the subpopulation of infested dogs were evaluated. Results: Despite the large macro-geographic variation in the dogs screened, there was no consistent difference between East and West Africa in terms of the diversity and numbers of ticks. The highest and lowest numbers of ticks were found in Nigeria and Namibia, respectively. Most often, there was a higher diversity of ticks in rural habitats than in urban habitats, although the highest diversity was observed in an urban Uganda setting. With the exception of Namibia, more fleas were collected in rural areas. We identified tick species (including Haemaphysalis spinulosa) as well as zoonotic pathogens (Coxiella burnetti, Trypanosoma spp.) that are not classically associated with companion animals. Rhipicephalus sanguineus was the most abundant tick, with a preference for urban areas. Exophilic ticks, such as Haemaphysalis spp., were more often found in rural areas. Several multi-host ticks occurred in urban areas. For R. sanguineus, housing conditions and additional pets were relevant factors in terms of infestation, while for a rural tick species (Haemaphysalis elliptica), free-roaming dogs were more often infested. Tick occurrence was associated to the use of endoparasiticide, but not to the use of ectoparasiticide. The most prevalent tick-borne pathogen was Hepatozoon canis followed by Ehrlichia canis. High levels of co-parasitism were observed in all countries and habitats. Conclusions: As dogs share a common environment with people, they have the potential to extend the network of pathogen transmission to humans. Our study will help epidemiologists to provide recommendations for surveillance and prevention of pathogens in dogs and humans.
Notes: Heylen, D (corresponding author), Inst Trop Med, Dept Biomed Sci, Ecoepidemiol Grp, Antwerp, Belgium.; Heylen, D (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Diepenbeek, Belgium.; Heylen, D (corresponding author), Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
dheylen@itg.be
Keywords: Dog; Sub-Sahara Africa; Ticks; Fleas; Vector-borne pathogens; Ixodes;;Haemaphysalis; Rhipicephalus; Amblyomma; Coxiella burnetii
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/36098
ISSN: 1756-3305
e-ISSN: 1756-3305
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-05014-8
ISI #: WOS:000719354000001
Rights: © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s13071-021-05014-8.pdfPublished version3.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

32
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

10
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.