Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/36419
Title: Objectively Measured Physical Activity as a COPD Clinical Trial Outcome
Authors: BURTIN, Chris 
Mohan, Divya
Troosters, Thierry
Watz, Henrik
Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
Moy, Marilyn L.
Vogiatzis, Ioannis
Rossiter, Harry B.
Singh, Sally
Merrill, Debora D.
Hamilton, Alan
Rennard, Stephen, I
Fageras, Malin
Petruzzelli, Stefano
Tal-Singer, Ruth
Tomaszewski, Erin
Corriol-Rohou, Solange
Rochester, Carolyn L.
Sciurba, Frank C.
Casaburi, Richard
Man, William D-C
Van Lummel, Rob C.
Cooper, Christopher B.
Demeyer, Heleen
SPRUIT, Martijn A. 
Vaes , Anouk
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Source: CHEST, 160 (6) , p. 2080 -2100
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Reduced physical activity is common in COPD and is associated with poor outcomes. Physical activity is therefore a worthy target for intervention in clinical trials; however, trials evaluating physical activity have used heterogeneous methods. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the available evidence on the efficacy and/or effectiveness of various interventions to enhance objectively measured physical activity in patients with COPD, taking into account the minimal preferred methodologic quality of physical activity assessment? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this narrative review, the COPD Biomarker Qualification Consortium (CBQC) task force searched three scientific databases for articles that reported the effect of an intervention on objectively measured physical activity in COPD. Based on scientific literature and expert consensus, only studies with >_ 7 measurement days and >_ 4 valid days of >_ 8 h of monitoring were included in the primary analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-seven of 110 (34%) identified studies fulfilled the criteria, investigating the efficacy and/or effectiveness of physical activity behavior change programs (n = 7), mobile or electronic-health interventions (n = 9), rehabilitative exercise (n = 9), bronchodilation (n = 6), lung volume reduction procedures (n = 3), and other interventions (n = 3). Results are generally variable, reflecting the large differences in study characteristics and outcomes. Few studies show an increase beyond the proposed minimal important change of 600 to 1100 daily steps, indicating that enhancing physical activity levels is a challenge. INTERPRETATION: Only one-third of clinical trials measuring objective physical activity in people with COPD fulfilled the preset criteria regarding physical activity assessment. Studies showed variable effects on physical activity even when investigating similar interventions.
Notes: Burtin, C (corresponding author), Hasselt Univ, Reval Rehabil Res Ctr, Biomed Biomed Res Inst, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
chris.burtin@uhasselt.be
Keywords: KEY WORDS;COPD;physical activity;systematic review
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/36419
ISSN: 0012-3692
e-ISSN: 1931-3543
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.044
ISI #: 000728782000041
Rights: 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

48
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.