Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/36483
Title: The value of screening questionnaires/scoring scales for obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with atrial fibrillation
Authors: DELESIE, Michiel 
KNAEPEN, Lieselotte 
Hendrickx, Bart
Huygen , Lisa
Verbraecken, Johan
Weytjens, Karolien
DENDALE, Paul 
HEIDBUCHEL, Hein 
DESTEGHE, Lien 
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
Source: Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases, 114 (11) , p. 737 -747
Abstract: Background. - Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is an important modifiable risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) but is underdiagnosed in this population. Currently, polysomnography is the gold standard for diagnosing OSA, but is expensive and requires overnight examination. Alternatively, home sleep apnoea testing can be used as a diagnostic tool, but also requires a complete data review. Therefore, these OSA diagnostic modalities are not ideal screening methods. Several OSA screening tools exist, but their value in patients with AF remains unclear. Aim. - To test the performance of existing screening questionnaires/scales for clinically relevant OSA in patients with AF referred for diagnostic polysomnography. Methods. - This prospective study compared the performance of seven screening tools (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin Questionnaire, Sleep Apnea Clinical Score, NoSAS, OSA50, STOP-Bang and MOODS) with polysomnography in the detection of clinically relevant OSA in consecutive patients with AF referred to two sleep clinics. Results. - A total of 100 patients referred for polysomnography and known previous AF were included. Polysomnography indicated at least clinically relevant OSA (i.e., apnoea-hypopnoea index > 15 events/hour) in 69% of cases, and 33% had severe OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea index > 30 events/hour). In screening for clinically relevant OSA, only the SACS and NoSAS scores had fair areas under the curve (0.704 and 0.712, respectively). None of the seven screening tools was performant enough (i.e., had a fair area under the curve > 0.7) in the detection of severe OSA. Conclusions. - In this AF cohort referred for polysomnography, clinically relevant OSA was prevalent. None of the selected screening tools showed sufficient performance as a good discriminative screening tool for clinically relevant OSA in patients with AF. Given these findings, other screening modalities for OSA should be considered in the work-up of patients with AF. (c) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Notes: Delesie, M (corresponding author), Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Drie Eikenstr 655, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium.
michiel.delesie@uantwerpen.be
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation;Sleep apnoea;Screening
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/36483
ISSN: 1875-2136
e-ISSN: 1875-2128
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2021.08.002
ISI #: 000724009300006
Rights: 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The value of screening questionnaires.pdfPeer-reviewed author version852.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
The value of screening questionnaires_scoring scales for obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with atrial fibrillation _ Elsevier Enhanced Reader.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version6.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

36
checked on Jun 15, 2022

Download(s)

2
checked on Jun 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.