Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/36607
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHodges, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorVOET, Stefaan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-03T15:42:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-03T15:42:36Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.date.submitted2022-01-24T12:21:44Z-
dc.identifier.citationHess, Burkhard; Kramer, Xandra E (Ed.). From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, p. 353 -378-
dc.identifier.isbn9783848742196-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/36607-
dc.description.abstractThis chapter focuses on a novel and developing form of dispute resolution: consumer dispute resolution or CDR. A first part highlights the difference between CDR and existing ADR mechanisms. CDR encompasses different architectures and can be facilitated by online dispute resolution (ODR) systems. Both gained moment in 2013 with a new Consumer ADR Directive and Consumer ODR Regulation. In the CDR orbit, other and different forms of (judicial) cooperation exist. A second part touches on the question of whether CDR systems provide efficient and effective enforcement and if anything further is needed. Particular attention is paid to new approaches of enforcement, such as regulatory redress and collaborative approaches between businesses and regulators. The last part tries to discern common principles, standards or rules relating to CDR. Besides the principles laid down in the Consumer ADR Directive , the focus is on other criteria in different contexts, such as the 2013 EC Recommendation on collective redress and the (English) administrative justice framework. The chapter concludes that CDR will continue to grow and expand.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherNomos Verlagsgesellschaft-
dc.rightsNomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, Germany 2017. All rights reserved. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without prior permission in writing from the publishers.-
dc.titleConsumer Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Effective Enforcement and Common Principles-
dc.typeBook Section-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsHess, Burkhard-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsKramer, Xandra E-
dc.identifier.epage378-
dc.identifier.spage353-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatB2-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedBook Section-
dc.identifier.doi10.5040/9781509918294.0017-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleFrom common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure-
item.contributorHodges, Christopher-
item.contributorVOET, Stefaan-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationHodges, Christopher & VOET, Stefaan (2017) Consumer Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Effective Enforcement and Common Principles. In: Hess, Burkhard; Kramer, Xandra E (Ed.). From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, p. 353 -378.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
9781509918294.0017.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version226.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Aug 8, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Aug 8, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.