Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/36748
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPANZAVOLTA, Michele-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-03T08:23:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-03T08:23:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.date.submitted2022-02-24T13:03:58Z-
dc.identifier.citationBachmaier Winter, Lorena (Ed.). The European Public Prosecutor's Office, Springer, p. 59 -86-
dc.identifier.isbn9783319939162-
dc.identifier.isbn9783319939155-
dc.identifier.issn2524-8049-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/36748-
dc.description.abstractThe establishment of the European Public prosecutor would mark the birth of the first truly European form of prosecution. The European Prosecutor would investigate on a case and then bring it in front of a national court for adjudica-tion. The paper discusses how the national adjudicating forum should be chosen for cases handled by the future European Public Prosecutor. It first looks at the current rules on overlapping of national jurisdictions. Then it considers what general over-arching fundamental principles spelled out in national constitutions and European covenants are applicable and what their practical implications are. Finally it critically discusses the rules which have been approved, making where possible some interpretative suggestions for improvement.-
dc.language.isonl-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLegal Studies in International, European and Comparative Criminal Law-
dc.rightsSpringer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018-
dc.subject.otherEPPO-
dc.subject.otherCriminal procedure-
dc.subject.otherConflicts of jurisdiction-
dc.subject.otherNatural judge-
dc.subject.otherProcedural safeguards-
dc.subject.otherDefendant’s rights-
dc.subject.otherDue process-
dc.titleChoosing the National Forum in Proceedings Conducted by the EPPO: Who Is to Decide?-
dc.typeBook Section-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsBachmaier Winter, Lorena-
dc.identifier.epage86-
dc.identifier.spage59-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatB2-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedBook Section-
local.relation.ispartofseriesnr1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-93916-2_4-
dc.identifier.eissn2524-8057-
local.provider.typePdf-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleThe European Public Prosecutor's Office-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.fullcitationPANZAVOLTA, Michele (2018) Choosing the National Forum in Proceedings Conducted by the EPPO: Who Is to Decide?. In: Bachmaier Winter, Lorena (Ed.). The European Public Prosecutor's Office, Springer, p. 59 -86.-
item.validationvabb 2023-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorPANZAVOLTA, Michele-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Panzavolta2018_Chapter_ChoosingTheNationalForumInProc.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version323.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.