Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37243
Title: Reasons affecting the uptake of reproductive genetic carrier screening among nonpregnant reproductive‐aged women in Flanders (Belgium)
Authors: Van Steijvoort, Eva
Demuynck, Remke
Peeters, Hilde
Vandecruys, Hilde
VERGUTS, Jasper 
Peeraer, Karen
Matthijs, Gert
Borry, Pascal
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: WILEY
Source: JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING
Status: Early view
Abstract: Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) allows to identify couples who have an increased likelihood of conceiving a child affected with an autosomal recessive or X-linked monogenic condition. Multiple studies have reported on a wide and fragmented set of reasons to accept or decline RGCS. Only a few studies have been performed to assess the uptake of RGCS. Nonpregnant women visiting their gynecologist were invited to complete a questionnaire assessing perceived susceptibility, the acceptability of offering RGCS, attitudes, the intention to participate in RGCS, reasons to accept or decline RGCS, and sociodemographic characteristics. Women who showed the intention to have RGCS were asked to consider a free RGCS offer. Most women (n = 127) were between 25 and 34 years old (60%), in a relationship (91%), and wanted to have children (65%). Study participants had positive attitudes towards RGCS and the intention to consider RGCS in the future. Reasons to accept RGCS were being able to share genetic information with children or relatives (n = 104/127, 82%), to prevent the birth of a child affected with a hereditary condition (n = 103/127, 81%), and/or to know the chance of conceiving a child with a hereditary condition (n = 102/127, 80%). Reasons for declining RGCS were the possible concerns that could arise when receiving test results (n = 27/127, 21%), having no family history of hereditary disorders (n = 19/127, 15%), and not wanting to take action based on test results (n = 13/127, 10%). Among test intenders that met the inclusion criteria, 53% decided to participate in RGCS together with their male reproductive partner. More in-depth research on the decision-making process behind the choice to accept or decline an RGCS offer would be highly valuable to make sure couples are making informed reproductive choices.
Notes: Van Steijvoort, E (corresponding author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium.
eva.vansteljvoort@kuleuven.be
Keywords: attitudes; carrier screening; carrier testing; decision-making;;intention; perceived susceptibility; preconception; risk perception;;uptake
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37243
ISSN: 1059-7700
e-ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1575
ISI #: WOS:000779377100001
Rights: © 2022 National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Journal of Genetic Counseling - 2022 - Van Steijvoort - Reasons affecting the uptake of reproductive genetic carrier.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version518.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

22
checked on Jun 1, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Jun 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.