Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/373
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Desmond-
dc.contributor.authorAaronson, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorSTANDAERT, Baudouin-
dc.contributor.authorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorTherasse, Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKoopmanschap, M.-
dc.contributor.authorErder, Haim M.-
dc.contributor.authorPiccart, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2004-10-25T12:02:12Z-
dc.date.available2004-10-25T12:02:12Z-
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cancer, 36(7). p. 834-844-
dc.identifier.issn0959-8049-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/373-
dc.description.abstractQuality of Life (QL) is now included as an endpoint in many phase III cancer clinical trials. Numerous statistical techniques have been presented in the literature to analyse QL data but there is still no agreement as to what is the optimal approach of analysis. In this paper we, therefore, present and compare various techniques which have all appeared in the literature and which may be globally described as summary measures and summary statistics. These techniques are illustrated using data from an EORTC clinical trial in locally advanced breast cancer (EORTC trial 10921). It is also explained in this paper how and when these techniques may be used in other cancer settings. For EORTC trial 10921, it is shown that by choosing different techniques different conclusions may be drawn concerning the QL outcome. This highlights the importance of choosing an appropriate primary statistical method and for describing it a priori in the protocol and analysis plan. In this paper, we show the importance of performing sensitivity or supportive analysis to support conclusions drawn from the primary analysis.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe EORTC Data Center is grateful to Amgen and Pharmacia Upjohn who provided support for this study.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.rights(C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.subjectMissing data-
dc.subjectClinical trials-
dc.subject.otherquality of life; EORTC QLQ-C30; summary measures; summary statistics-
dc.titleSummary measures and statistics in the analysis of quality of life data: An example from an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK locally advanced breast cancer study-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage844-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage834-
dc.identifier.volume36-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00056-3-
dc.identifier.isi000087093100011-
item.fullcitationCurran, Desmond; Aaronson, Neil; STANDAERT, Baudouin; MOLENBERGHS, Geert; Therasse, Patrick; Ramirez, A.; Koopmanschap, M.; Erder, Haim M. & Piccart, M. (2000) Summary measures and statistics in the analysis of quality of life data: An example from an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK locally advanced breast cancer study. In: European Journal of Cancer, 36(7). p. 834-844.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2001-
item.contributorCurran, Desmond-
item.contributorAaronson, Neil-
item.contributorSTANDAERT, Baudouin-
item.contributorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
item.contributorTherasse, Patrick-
item.contributorRamirez, A.-
item.contributorKoopmanschap, M.-
item.contributorErder, Haim M.-
item.contributorPiccart, M.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0959-8049-
crisitem.journal.eissn1879-0852-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version210.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

44
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

40
checked on Sep 26, 2024

Page view(s)

46
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

42
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.