Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37619
Title: | Effect of Lidocaine 2% Versus Bupivacaine 0.5% and 1 Versus 2 Dual Separate Injections on Onset and Duration of Ultrasound-Guided Wrist Blocks: A Blinded 2 x 2 Factorial Randomized Clinical Trial | Authors: | VAN BOXSTAEL, Sam Lopez, Ana M. BALOCCO, Angela Vandepitte , Catherine MEEX, Ingrid DUERINCKX, Joris Kuroda, Maxine M. MESOTTEN, Dieter Van Herreweghe, Imre Hadzic, Admir |
Issue Date: | 2022 | Publisher: | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS | Source: | Anesthesia and analgesia, 134 (6) , p. 1318 -1325 | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Local anesthetics are often selected or mixed to accomplish faster onset of anesthesia. However, with ultrasound guidance, local anesthetics are delivered with greater precision, which may shorten the onset time with all classes of local anesthetics. In this study, we compared onset time and duration of ultrasound-guided wrist blocks with a fast onset versus a longer lasting local anesthetic administered via single or dual (spatially separate) injections at the level of the midforearm. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 36 subjects scheduled for carpal tunnel release were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided median and ulnar nerve blocks with lidocaine 2% or bupivacaine 0.5% via single or dual injections (n = 9 in each group). Subjects fulfilled the study requirements. The main outcome variables were onset and duration of sensory blockade, which were tested separately in 2 (drug) x 2 (injection) analysis of variances (ANOVAs) with interaction terms. RESULTS: Sensory block onset time did not differ significantly between subjects given lidocaine 2% (9.2 +/- 3.4 minutes) or bupivacaine 0.5% (9.5 +/- 3.1 minutes) (P = .76; mean difference, -0.3 +/- 1.1 minutes [95% confidence interval {CI}, -2.5 to 1.9]) or between the single- (9.6 +/- 2.8 minutes) and dual- (9.1 +/- 3.6 minutes) injection groups (P = .69; mean difference, -0.4 +/- 1.1 minutes [95% CI, -1.8 to 2.6]). Sensory duration was longer for subjects in the bupivacaine 0.5% group (27.3 +/- 11.6 hours) than for subjects in the lidocaine 2% group (8.4 +/- 4.1 hours) (P < .001; 95% CI, 12.7-25.1). However, sensory duration in the single- (15.7 +/- 12.5 hours) and dual- (19.4 +/- 13.1 hours) injection groups did not differ significantly (P = .28; mean difference, -3.7 +/- 4.3 hours [95% CI, -12.6 to 5.1]). CONCLUSIONS: No significant effect was found for onset time between lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% used in ultrasound-guided wrist blocks. Dual injections did not shorten onset time. Since mean nerve block duration was longer with bupivacaine 0.5%, our results suggest that the selection of local anesthetic for the median and ulnar nerves at the level of the midforearm should be based on the desired duration of the block and not on its speed of onset. | Notes: | Van Boxstael, S (corresponding author), Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Anesthesiol, Schiepse Bos 6, B-3600 Genk, Belgium. sam.vanboxstael@zol.be |
Keywords: | Anesthetics, Local;Humans;Ultrasonography, Interventional;Wrist;Bupivacaine;Lidocaine | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37619 | ISSN: | 0003-2999 | e-ISSN: | 0003-2999 | DOI: | 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005936 | ISI #: | WOS:000798065000035 | Rights: | 2022 International Anesthesia Research Society | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | ecoom 2023 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Effect_of_Lidocaine_2__Versus_Bupivacaine_0_5__and.25.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 471.58 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
AA-D-21-00337_R3-3.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 424.72 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.